Antiquities and Archaeology Italy

Culture ministry condemned over running of archaeological sites

Report finds multiple failings in maintenance, security and management

Out with the old: former Italian Culture Minister Sandro Bondi in the ancient city of Pompeii

ROME. Italy’s Court of Auditors has released a damning report entitled An Enquiry into the State of Maintenance of Archae­ological Sites. The report is fiercely critical of the Ministero per i Beni e le Attività Culturali (Mibac, the Ministry for Cultural Heritage), its organisation and the way its responsibilities are divided up between national, regional and local bodies.

The 52-page document examined the three-year period from 2007 to 2009. The auditors focused on the maintenance, security and management of Italy’s most important archaeological sites and concluded that the amount of money needed “far exceeds the available resources, although there is no doubt that the proper conservation and promotion of this heritage would have a positive impact on the tourist industry”. The report added that 15 million visits are made to archaeological sites in Italy each year, representing the “driving force of cultural tourism in Italy”.

The exchange of information between the ministry, the superintendencies (the local arms of the ministry) and regional agencies is inadequate, the auditors found. In a time of reduced public spending, it said it was all the more important to have “greater transparency” on spending priorities and procedures. In particular, the court pointed to a “serious lack of control” over the activities of the superintendencies. These routinely fail to inform Mibac’s general director of works being carried out to conserve and protect sites.

The court was also highly critical of the government’s frequent use of “emergency powers” to set up commissions to intervene in sites such as Pompeii (the use of these emergency powers was terminated in June 2010).

The auditors said it was unacceptable that there is still no central database covering excavations, the cataloguing of finds and collections, or counting visitors and ticket sales. They further noted the absence of data held by the ministry on the management and upkeep of those sites which have been entrusted to special commissioners: in particular the Domus Aurea (a large villa built by Nero) in Rome; Rome’s historic archaeological zone; and Pompeii.

The report does, however, highlight some achievements, including the near-complete survey of archaeological sites in Italy and the creation of a “computerised archaeological map”.

Altogether, the court of auditors concluded, the ministry of culture is completely disorganised, in part a result of what it called “the stressful reforms that have affected Mibac over the past five years”.

The report says that newly appointed culture minister, Gian­carlo Galan, needs to make major changes to the whole decision-making and control processes within Mibac’s antiquities division.

“The central system is losing contact with the periphery, with the result that it no longer receives any feedback concerning the actual execution of works, their state of progress, or the efficiency and efficacy of the costs incurred,” the report concludes.

More from The Art Newspaper


21 Jul 11
16:49 CET


And what is the U.S. State Department's response to the crisis in management of cultural property in Italy? Strip American collectors of ancient objects made in Italy that are not "legitimized" by a modern provenance or export permit. Then, send those objects back to Italy where they will be cared for with loving devotion (pardon the sarcasm). This dance plays well to the ethical and altruistic of heart. But what the band is really doing behind the scenes is trading basic human rights to self education and cultural enrichment for a few diplomatic favors. They disdain the legitimate market for antiquities and treat everything without their ordained stamp of approval as illicit - even though these object are, by law, perfectly legal. It's a pathetic commentary on what government has become these days.

Submit a comment

All comments are moderated. If you would like your comment to be approved, please use your real name, not a pseudonym. We ask for your email address in case we wish to contact you - it will not be made public and we do not use it for any other purpose.


Want to write a longer comment to this article? Email


Share this