Controversies Mexico

Heading back to Mexico a step at a time

Austria and Mexico close to a deal that would see Moctezuma’s Crown return on loan

If Austria lends the royal headdress, Mexico might allow Maximilian’s golden coach to visit Vienna

MEXICO CITY. Mexico and Austria have moved a step closer to sharing Moctezuma’s Crown as Austria seriously considers returning the feathered headdress on loan for three years. It would mean that for the first time in 500 years the headdress returns to Mexico. The Mexican government is even discussing a change in its antiquities law to make the loan possible. Should the loan happen, it would set an important precedent for European museums with contentious objects in their collections.

Christian Feest, the director of Vienna’s Museum of Ethnology, describes the fabled object as “the Mona Lisa of ethnology”. Once assumed to be the crown of the Aztec rulers, the feather headdress is unique in its survival from the pre-Columbian Americas. Made from the tail feathers of over 200 quetzal birds, it is decorated with gold. In 1878, it went to the forerunner of the Museum of Ethnology (now part of the Kunsthistorisches Museum).

Last year the two countries agreed to co-operate over this part of their shared cultural heritage with Mexico’s National Institute for Anthropology and History and Austria’s Museum of Ethnology forming a bi-national commission.

Mexico’s foreign ministry says the goal is “to enable Mexicans to admire the headdress”. It also says that “an artefact currently in a Mexican museum that is of interest to Austria” might be lent to Vienna. This could be the golden coach of Mexico’s Emperor Maximilian in the Museo Nacional de Historia.

Two issues need to be resolved before a loan can be arranged. The first hurdle is legal, since there is a long-standing Mexican law that forbids the re-export of any archaeological material from the country. Initially it was hoped that the headdress would not be regarded as archaeological, but the Vienna museum needs assurance that its return would not be blocked. A special presidential decree on the headdress was discussed, but this might not be legally binding on future presidents. The Mexican government is now considering a change in the law on the re-export of antiquities.

Austrian and Mexican conservators also need to agree to the loan. The headdress was remounted on a display board in 1992 and cannot be easily detached. Conservators are reluctant to do so until a decision has been made on a new backing. This will depend on whether it has to be fit to travel. The feather vanes are fragile so a vibration-free case would have to be devised.

Decisions on the conservation and legal issues are expected later in 2011. Meanwhile, the joint scholarly analysis of the headdress continues. It is now being suggested that it may not even be an Aztec object from Mexico. “Quetzal birds are also found in neighbouring Guatemala, so it could be Mayan,” Feest explained. The headdress has been in storage since 2004, because most of the Museum of Ethnology has been closed for building work.

More from The Art Newspaper

Comments

11 Dec 12
20:24 CET

MARCOS, SANTA ROSA

I am glad that the crown of the aztec leader will return to Mexico. It belongs to Mexico and represents the people of Mexico. The crown returning to Mexico would allow Mexican to view their once leader of one of the greatest empires in the world.

18 Apr 11
0:58 CET

KRISTIAN NAMMACK, NEW YORK

I thought I saw this displayed in the Anthropological Museum in Mexico City last week, or maybe it was another one, or a fascimile.

21 Mar 11
17:13 CET

OLIVIA SANCHEZ BROWN, LOS ANGELES

It"s important for the international community to be exposed to the contributions the Americas have made to human development, in all aspects of culture-art, agriculture, architecture, astronomy, mathematics, social organization, spiritually, and so on. We are more aware of the Egyptians because of the exposure their antiquities have had on the international scene...I hope this issue, between Austria and Mexico, can be resolved on a positive note... keeping the integrity of the art and cultural history in mind.

13 Mar 11
16:44 CET

CLAUDIA GALINDO, RIVERSIDE CA, USA

I am ashamed that this belong to Austria, as usual all European countries likes the best of our Latin Countries ( gold, silver sculptures) they are vultures!!!!!! and envy our culture, we are going to get that back!!

13 Mar 11
16:43 CET

BRYANT, VANCOUVER, B.C.

Wonderful to see international cooperation between Vienna and Mexico—a fine and bold 21st century step regarding cultural property. Ultimate repository, however, is always a sensitive issue when one country has part of another's classical heritage. I wonder if the next bold step will be "shared ownership" agreements which allow countries to house material for 10 or 12 years at a time, thus circumventing short "three" year loans and enabling the country of origin to feel at least some from of "long term" ownership. On another note: Have always believed the headress to be Aztec, given the history and publicity of same. But that it could just as easily be Mayan is a fine and perhaps overdue revelation. What evidence was there that it had Aztec provenance in the first place (beyond associations of similar regalia)?

11 Mar 11
7:17 CET

JOSE, NEW YORK

this crown belongs in mexico it is disrespectful that it has been away from mexico for that long.

Submit a comment

All comments are moderated. If you would like your comment to be approved, please use your real name, not a pseudonym. We ask for your email address in case we wish to contact you - it will not be made public and we do not use it for any other purpose.

Email*
 
Name*
 
City*
 
Comment*
 

Want to write a longer comment to this article? Email letters@theartnewspaper.com

 

Share this