Museums United Kingdom

Low risk, high premiums

Museums greatly over estimate the dangers of lending, European research shows

Staff move a 16th-century painting by Quinten Massijs at the Royal Museum of Fine Arts, Antwerp, in 2009; the Rijksmuseum trusted its Belgian colleagues to keep their Dutch masterpieces safe too

EUROPE. When works of art are lent by Europe’s leading museums, the cost of buying commercial insurance can swallow as much as 15% of the borrower’s exhibition budget, research by an expert working group, funded by the European Commission, has revealed.

Lending institutions frequently “over-evaluate risks, which in turn leads to high insurance premiums”, said Frank Bergevoet, a member of the working group and co-ordinator for Collections Mobility 2.0, the European-funded project to reduce the financial and administrative obstacles to lending. “Museums insist on cover against risks of damage or loss that they do not have when the works of art hang on their own walls,” he added. Even when countries have a state indemnity scheme, a form of self-insurance whereby a government supports loan exhibitions by taking on part of the risk from the borrowing institutions, lenders often require additional commercial insurance.

The researchers discovered only seven reported claims out of 5,605 loans covered by state indemnity schemes from 2003-08. Damage was minor and the total compensation paid was a mere €80,000.

Bergevoet praised Amster­dam’s Rijksmuseum and the Royal Fine Arts Museum, Antwerp, which agreed that 33 paintings lent by the Dutch museum from 2004-07 would only be insured when being moved. Paul Huvenne, the director of the Antwerp museum, explained: “We were able to reduce the insurance costs considerably.”

Another member of the working group, Susanna Pettersson, the director of the Alvar Aalto Museum, Finland, and formerly head of development at the Finnish National Gallery, said that museum professionals need to “loosen up a little bit” and reassess the risks involved and how they spend their limited resources.

Nick Brett, the underwriting director of Axa Art Insurance, welcomed the way museums were reassessing the risks of lending, but struck a note of caution: “What if country X lends to country Y and there is a fire? With a commercial policy you know what the deal is.” Furthermore, if a work is stolen, he said, insurance companies never give up seeking their recovery.

Sandy Nairne, the director of London’s National Portrait Gallery, said the low number of claims is a huge “tick” for museum security and their standards of care but as a director he had to “try to balance different kinds of risk”. Paintings do get stolen, he said, recalling the two Turners lent by the Tate to a show in Frankfurt in 1994. “Without insurance the Tate would have had no money, nor the paintings.” A training event on lending is due to be held next month at the Budapest Museum of Fine Arts, a final part of the current phase in the ongoing collections mobility project.

More from The Art Newspaper

Comments

20 Feb 11
6:10 CET

RICHARD HOGEVEEN, DEN HAAG

On the picture you see the Dutch art transport company of Hizkia van Kralingen to work. This company has extensive experience in moving various types of art. If you work with this company, you are assured of a proffisionele act of arthandling.

12 Feb 11
14:7 CET

TREVOR, YORK

For museums public perception is very important. For tax payer funded museums the potential outcry if there was loss or damage which was not insured (especially where the loan is to another country) is great. Independent museums will generally insure their collections even when not on loan. But if the risk is so low, why do the insurers charge such high premiums - they are the experts in risk after all.

11 Feb 11
22:27 CET

CHARLES DESMARAIS, NEW YORK

A primary reason lenders "over-estimate risk" is that the borrower pays the insurance. If someone else is paying, the logic goes, why not hedge against even tiny risk? This explains why the museum that owns a work may have extraordinarily rigid standards as a lender, but quite different standards at home (where it would have to pay the premium.)

Submit a comment

All comments are moderated. If you would like your comment to be approved, please use your real name, not a pseudonym. We ask for your email address in case we wish to contact you - it will not be made public and we do not use it for any other purpose.

Email*
 
Name*
 
City*
 
Comment*
 

Want to write a longer comment to this article? Email letters@theartnewspaper.com

 

Share this