USA

Motherwell foundation fights former employee over wrongful dismissal claim

Joan Banach is suing to be reinstated onto the board of the Dedalus Foundation

new york. A pair of lawsuits winding through New York courts, pitting late abstract expressionist painter Robert Motherwell’s Dedalus Foundation against Joan Banach, a longtime foundation officer, have made little progress since first filed last March. The cases have bounced between various judges and courts, without coming to trial. Delays have arisen due to disputes over jurisdiction and administrative matters such as the court’s calendar. “The court process can be a lengthy one, but we are eager to get to trial and vindicate our client’s rights before a jury,” said Lee Bantle, of Bantle and Levy, one of Banach’s lawyers. The Dedalus Foundation and lawyers declined to comment.

In the interim, Banach filed an amended complaint on 10 April 2009, adding gender discrimination to a long list of allegations. The fight first went public on 25 March 2009, when Banach, a 61-year-old artist, curator and art historian involved with Motherwell since 1981, filed suit in New York State court seeking to be reinstated to the board along with her role at the foundation, where she earned $108,309 in 2007, according to the most recent tax filing available on GuideStar. Before he died in 1991, Motherwell signed a letter guaranteeing Banach “lifetime employment” at the foundation, she claims. She alleges she was wrongfully ousted by foundation president Jack Flam, “a man with overstated expertise in Motherwell’s work”, and “a temper against any who would challenge him”, according to her suit. Flam orchestrated “a malicious campaign” to remove her in retribution for disagreements over authentication of major Motherwell works of art. Banach was hired as Motherwell’s assistant in 1981, ten years before his death. She worked for the foundation as a curator, director and vice president before her termination in August 2008, according to her complaint.

Dedalus filed suit against Banach on 25 March in US district court, accusing her of selling “misappropriated” Motherwell works at auction and through New York gallery Knoedler and Company. The suit alleges that she “secretly” consigned 1958 Motherwell drawings to Christie’s that she had never disclosed to the board as owning, as is the foundation’s policy. The suit accuses Banach of having “misappropriated at least ten Motherwell works”, and selling $93,200 worth of work, without having reported these transactions to the board. Banach’s actions were “deceptive, self-interested and fraudulent”, according to the suit. Banach denies the allegations and says the works were gifts from the artist. The foundation claims $5m in damages, and asks Banach to return all Motherwell works and proceeds of sales, and reimburse the foundation for $324,874.57, the equivalent of two and a half years of salary and benefits.

The foundation’s assets tallied $59m in 2007, including $20m in Motherwell art, according to tax filings. Dedalus spends more than $2m a year on collection care and organising the artist’s archive for future public research. Flam earned $229,336 in 2007, and executive director Morgan Spangle made $239,588, according to tax records. Other board members include Richard Rubin, author and critic Dore Ashton, former Museum of Modern Art curator John Elderfield and Columbia University art history professor David Rosand.

More from The Art Newspaper

Comments

9 May 10
18:37 CET

JACK STEPHENS, LOS ANGELES

In response to the Law Suit, the Foundation most likely deserves it. From experience I have seen board members on other foundations work closely with specific art dealers to control a multi million dollar a year business. A lot of the time these board members own works by the artist and sometimes aquire unauthenticated works at below market value from private partys. Six months later the work is up at Christies with a six to seven figure estimate on it. The Warhol foundation has had simular dispuits along with the Pollack committee. I truly can say without false arrogance that I am very knowledgeable in Art, more than most curators. I have witnessed scholars along with auction houses make mistakes that should destroy their credability. All though many of them are well educated they dress up their work while standing on the shoulders of their predecessors who showed true Genius. Foundations need to be formed with true scholars who incorporate science and wisdom rather politics.

23 Jan 10
18:24 CET

JOSEPH K. LEVENE, NEW YORK

Most signficantly, the two lawsuits that Ms. Pollock writes about raise significant questions as to whether impartial and accurate Authenticity decisions have made by the Dedalus Foundation for Robert Motherwell Works of Art, adding instability to the vast Robert Motherwell Market. Issues include: • Is the Dedalus Foundation providing impartial Authenticity decisions concerning purported Robert Motherwell Works of Art? • Is the Foundation acting in the best interests of Robert Motherwell? • Or as described in the Banach Lawsuit, is The Foundation operating in the best interests of certain individual Board Members? • Are Authenticity decisions made unilaterally or by formal Committee? To read more about these two dueling lawsuits, please visit, our March 2009 Article in The Fine Art Blog titled: "Dueling Lawsuits Undermine Robert Motherwell Authenticity Decisions." http://jklfa.blogspot.com/2009/03/dueling-lawsuits-undermine-robert.html

22 Jan 10
21:46 CET

PAINT BIRD, AURORA

Elaine- Dore Ashton is one of the very very few great Art writers of her generation. You would do well to actually read her-Rothko, Guston, Arikha, start anywhere...sincere P.B.

22 Jan 10
15:12 CET

ELAINE WECHSLER, NEW YORK. NY

Dear Lindsay: Yeah for you more fraudulent activity re the art world should be reported . As for the Motherwell case, too many cooks spoil the broth and as in any foundation the artists wishes are usually not followed and there is a lot of theivery. The thing I find interesting is that the art critics and historians are the worst they are always looking for ways of making money...especially people like Doe Ashton who writes many vanity books and articles. I do think its time to expose the inner workings of the art world always a VERY unregulated business and run and controlled by very few!! Elaine Wechsler

Submit a comment

All comments are moderated. If you would like your comment to be approved, please use your real name, not a pseudonym. We ask for your email address in case we wish to contact you - it will not be made public and we do not use it for any other purpose.

Email*
 
Name*
 
City*
 
Comment*
 

Want to write a longer comment to this article? Email letters@theartnewspaper.com

 

Share this