Antiquities and Archaeology News Egypt

No consensus on tackling Egypt looting

Everyone agrees on the need to act, but controversy remains over what will work

The Egyptian archaeologist Monica Hanna is campaigning to create watchdog groups around Egypt who will use social media to alert others to looting

Looting in Egypt has reached crisis point, but there is widespread disagreement over the best way to stop the theft and illegal trade of antiquities. Cultural heritage experts in the US have signed a pact to tackle the issue, and companies such as eBay and Christie’s have pledged their support. Meanwhile, ordinary Egyptians are turning to Twitter to try to save their heritage. Monica Hanna, the Egyptian archaeologist who tweeted for help last August after thieves swept through the Malawi National Museum in Minya, is campaigning to create watchdog groups around Egypt who will use social media to alert others to looting. Public pressure is also causing the US government to act.

Because the US is considered a target market for the looted artefacts, the Egyptian government wants to impose emergency trade restrictions, which are intended to give customs officials greater powers to seize artefacts that do not have valid export documents. As a signatory to the 1970 Unesco Convention, Egypt can request that the US impose temporary restrictions of the import of the most endangered categories of Egyptian cultural heritage, but opponents fear the restrictions will extend to all objects of a certain age (to be determined). Further, some US experts say the sanctions will harm the interests of legitimate collectors and dealers, and in any case will not stop the looting.

Critics also question the legality of the process, saying the government has not followed the proper system of checks and balances. Peter Tompa, a cultural heritage lawyer, says that the US State Department has failed to respond to concerns raised by members of the Cultural Property Advisory Committee, which advises the US president, about the transparency of the process—including the lack of any public consultation. “The department seems determined to complete as many and as broad memorandums of understanding as possible, at the expense of small businesses and collectors,” Tompa says.

In a separate move, the Egyptian antiquities minister has signed a public-private partnership agreement with the International Coalition to Protect Egyptian Antiquities, whose members include the Capitol Archaeological Institute at the George Washington University, the Archaeological Institute of America, the American Schools of Oriental Research and the National Geographic Society—all of whom support the emergency sanctions. The aim of the agreement is to prevent illegal trade as well as to provide training for Egyptians to protect their heritage sites.

Research by the Antiquities Coalition produced last year suggests thefts at archaeological sites in Egypt have rocketed by between 500% and 1,000% since the Arab Spring uprisings of 2011. “The illegal trade of Egyptian antiquities is a worldwide problem, but the US is one of the target markets,” says Andrew Moore, the president of the Archaeological Institute of America. “There’s no doubt that the organised trafficking of Egyptian antiquities has increased in the US.” Figures compiled by the US International Trade Commission reveal that $10.7m-worth of Egyptian archaeological, historical and ethnographic goods were imported to the US in 2013—an increase of 105.5% on 2012, when imports were worth $5.2m. In 2011 imports totalled $1.2m. The figures do not include undocumented, smuggled objects.

Some heritage experts disagree that the US is at the heart of the problem. “There are only a handful of people selling or collecting Egyptian art in the US today, and the market is for works that have been out of Egypt for at least 40 years, with good provenance and clean title,” says the art lawyer Kate Fitz Gibbon of Fitz Gibbon Law. The import figures include all archaeological, historical and ethnographic objects originally created in Egypt, irrespective of whether they have been housed in collections in other countries for several years, or whether they have come directly from Egypt. The import of one or two valuable objects could account for the jumps in value year-on-year, says Michael McCullough, a US customs law specialist.

Meanwhile, a spokeswoman for Christie’s New York says there has been no net increase in the number of Egyptian objects consigned for sale since 2011, but that the auction house remains “vigilant” when handling antiquities from this region.

Deborah Lehr, the chairman of the Capitol Archaeological Institute, urges the international community to step in, praising Monica Hanna in an opinion piece published on The World Post website in March. “Heroes like Hanna need outside help because of the scope of the problem, the lack of available domestic resources and the lack of international co-operation,” Lehr says.

Update, 30 April 2014: A meeting between the Cultural Property Advisory Committee and the US Department of State has now been scheduled for 2-4 June, when the request by the Egyptian government for sanctions will be reviewed. There will be an opportunity for public comment on 2 June. ​

More from The Art Newspaper

Comments

14 May 14
11:51 CET

DAVID THOMPSON, YORKS

A predictable consequence of burying enormous wealth is that other people will try to dig it up. The history of looting in Egypt was determined five thousand years ago by a practice that continued to stuff valuables underground for the next three millennia. During periods of internal unrest, when ruling elites were weak and the rule of law was difficult to enforce, damage to tombs and temples and the removal of objects increased. Set in a historical context the looting that has recently been taking place is unsurprising. Applying further regulations to western markets will do nothing to deter thieves for the simple reason that they don't really need them. It has always been profitable to prize the gold eyes out of bronze statue or melt down a gold bracelet, certainly more profitable than the toil of the sebakheen who demolish ancient sites in the same tradition. The only effective deterrent to looting has been physical security, this was true in the Old Kingdom and it is now.

4 May 14
22:22 CET

SUE MCGOVERN-HUFFMAN, WASHINGTON, DC

I am disturbed to read of the growing public trend to believe the profound escalation of looting in Egypt is solely fueled by a greedy international trade of unscrupulous dealers, auction houses and collectors. As a dealer myself, I and my colleagues should certainly have noticed by now a plethora of Egyptian antiquities with questionable provenance, flowing onto the commercial market. Yet, this has not been the case. We wholeheartedly support the preservation and protection of cultural property in Egypt but it appears more often than not, objects are being looted and destroyed in Egypt for fanatic religious reasons or through urban encroachment, rather than smuggled into the US to satisfy a craven collecting itch. There is no doubt Egypt needs assistance to protect their ancient sites, but I do question whether the limitation of Egyptian antiquities into the USA is the solution.

Submit a comment

All comments are moderated. If you would like your comment to be approved, please use your real name, not a pseudonym. We ask for your email address in case we wish to contact you - it will not be made public and we do not use it for any other purpose.

Email*
 
Name*
 
City*
 
Comment*
 

Want to write a longer comment to this article? Email letters@theartnewspaper.com

 

Share this