Obama’s pledges for the arts

Important policies in place, but some say more can be done

NEW YORK. Artists and arts organisations are hoping for greater support than they received from President Bush when President-elect Barack Obama takes up office later this month. Mr Obama was the only candidate during the election to distribute a detailed programme of initiatives. These include plans for an “Artist Corps” of young artists to promote art in schools and low-income communities, increased funding for the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA), health care for artists, and allowing artists to deduct the market value of any works they donate to museums or public institutions.

In November, during his first interview after winning the election on NBC’s weekly news programme “Meet the Press”, host Tom Brokaw asked Mr Obama what kind of cultural and artistic changes he would make as president. “Our art and our culture…that’s the essence of what makes America special, and we want to project that as much as possible in the White House,” said Mr Obama. He has announced a three-person advisory team dedicated to reviewing the two main agencies responsible for providing government grants to arts and culture projects, the NEA and the National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH). Since the chairmanships for both these organisations become vacant in January, the team will advise Mr Obama on whom to appoint to the posts. The members of the advisory group are: former NEA chairman Bill Ivey; Anne Luzzatto, a former Clinton official and a member of Obama’s arts policy committee; and African-American historian Clement Price of Rutgers University in Newark.

But some groups think Mr Obama can do more. A coalition of arts organisations, including the American Association of Museums, Americans for the Arts, the Association of Art Museum Directors, and the National Assembly of State Arts Agencies, among others, submitted a report to Obama’s office recommending further measures to improve government support of the arts. Among the suggestions—such as increasing the NEA’s annual budget to $319.2m, expanding international cultural exchange, and reinstating an arts curriculum in schools—is the important idea of appointing a senior-level official in the White House that would be responsible for overseeing the administration’s entire arts and cultural policy.

More from The Art Newspaper

Comments

20 Sep 09
14:14 CET

JAMES MOENING, EASTON, PA

Regardless of partisanship, a fund that barely meets a one dollar per capita figure is a telling indicator where the country and its people stand on art.

20 Sep 09
14:14 CET

LISA MAYER, CLEVELAND

“I am just so happy to see the arts being celebrated, primarily, because we live in such complicated times — “VIVA ICEALITY Obama”!!

20 Sep 09
14:14 CET

LUCKY, SUMTER

This is the first serious challenge to the notion that the arts are for the idle rich and that in tough economic times the first casualties are arts education and sports. The foundation for mental growth and development in young people is art, music, and physical activities. Governmental support is vital to assure they are priorities in this culture.

20 Sep 09
14:14 CET

MILENA THOMAS, ROYAL OAK

I find it odd that the author mentions George Bush's lack of support for the NEA, when appropriations increased every year he has been in office, in comparison to Clinton, who dramatically cut funding during his Presidency.

Submit a comment

All comments are moderated. If you would like your comment to be approved, please use your real name, not a pseudonym. We ask for your email address in case we wish to contact you - it will not be made public and we do not use it for any other purpose.

Email*
 
Name*
 
City*
 
Comment*
 

Want to write a longer comment to this article? Email letters@theartnewspaper.com

 

Share this