Smithsonian censorship saga: the next chapter
By The Art Newspaper. From In The Frame
Published online: 06 January 2011
The Smithsonian censorship saga just won't go away...Jim Hedges, a hedge-fund specialist and art aficionado, recently wrote to Martin Sullivan, director of the National Portrait Gallery (NPG) in Washington, DC, requesting that his loaned work Untitled, Self-Portrait by Jack Pierson be removed from the Hide/Seek NPG exhibition "until such time as the David Wojnarowicz video is reinstated in its full unedited version" (Wojnarowicz's piece, A Fire in My Belly, shows a crucifix covered with ants; it was withdrawn following protests by a group of Republican congressmen and the Catholic League). Hedges has now received a reply from Sullivan which he has kindly posted on his Facebook wall. In the letter, Sullivan states that: "At the NPG, we sympathize with your objection. Co-curators David Ward and Jonathan Katz have publicly stated their opposition to the removal of the video, and the show continues to attract record crowds while bringing attention to a crucial theme that other museums have not yet highlighted. Secretary Wayne Clough and the Smithsonian Regents committed to keeping the exhibition up for its full run without further censorship, and we appreciate their firm stand on that question." Sullivan intriguingly adds: "Katz argues that those who would be most punished if additional works are withdrawn from the exhibit are neither the fringe political/religious activists nor even the Smithsonian, but the audiences who lose access to art. In his words, 'Why fight censorship with more censorship? Shouldn't we press for real debate and dialogue instead?'
For this reason, I hope you'll reconsider the withdrawal of Pierson's Untitled, Self-Portrait." Watch this space.
Submit a comment
Please provide your email address. This
is in case we wish to contact you - it will not be
made public and we do not use it for any other purpose.