Contemporary art Fairs Books China

When diversity is a disguise of uniformity

Have curators and collectors replaced critics?

Gabriel Orozco, La DS, 1993. Photo: courtesy the artist and Marian Goodman Gallery, New York

If one peruses coverage of the art fairs and biennales, one notices something curious. Much prominent new painting in China (Yue Minjun, Zhang Xiaogang, Yan Pei-Ming) and Russia (Dubossarsky and Vinogradov, Olga Soldatova, Ilya Gaponov) is reminiscent of 19th-century French academic art of the Paris Salon. The large-scale, smooth surfaces, art-historical references, presentation of outré subject matter in aesthetically acceptable terms and aversion to innovation all parallel art of Victorian salons to an uncanny degree.

In Western Art and the Wider World, Paul Wood discusses how non-Western art is frequently perceived in relation to European standards. Although he presents no original findings, Wood adeptly summarises the subject in several areas, including Orientalism and images of the New World. The core of the book is how Modernism and the Western canon have been reframed by new art theorists since 1968, abandoning the Old Left Marxist production- and class-based analyses in favour of New Left structuralist, post-colonialist and identity-based models.

Wood’s evident sympathy for the progressive ideals shared by the Old Left and Modernism (namely, commonality, social progress and liberation through education and technology) comes through when he criticises the limitations of identity politics and structuralism. Wood is cutting about the New Left’s tendency to dethrone white, male artists in order to crown über-curators, who arrange exhibitions via their smartphones while jetting between biennales. It is a fallacy to claim that postmodernist curators stand outside history and dispense social and political justice through exhibition and publication in a way that Modernist artists could not.

The Global Art Compass by Alistair Hicks, the senior curator of the Deutsche Bank Collection, surveys the art familiar from today’s art fairs. The selection is international in scope, each artist getting an illustration and a few paragraphs of discussion, anecdotal in nature and usually centring on Hicks’s encounters with artists in studios or galleries. The roll call of Alÿs, Cattelan, Kapoor, Kentridge, Neshat, Orozco and Pettibon conforms to the standard global-art-scene model. I cannot see for whom this book is intended—chronic art fair attendees, perhaps.

The complete absence of abstract painting is unforgiveable and telling. Hicks has a bias towards conceptual and anecdotal art and an aversion to visually and conceptually ambiguous art of a strongly pictorial/optical character. Hicks manages almost entirely to avoid discussing the visual properties of the art he champions. One cannot but conclude that Hicks either does not care what art looks like or thinks it does not matter. The failure of current critics to draw blood from the complacent, self-congratulatory commonplaces of new art is a matter to be lamented. Art criticism is in crisis precisely because critics are afraid to discuss the visual properties of art as Ruskin and Greenberg did. Which is just how the New Left intended it: consigning revanchist bourgeois aesthetics to the dustbin of history.

Hicks asserts that artists have liberated themselves from restrictive narratives imposed by overbearing critics, yet he fails to realise that the current consensus on what is advanced or worthwhile in art among contemporary curators and collectors is just as oppressive as the dictates of any prominent individual critic. Cliques stifle diversity more effectively than individuals do, groups being harder to combat. The global cycle of art fairs and biennales propagates conformity with fashionable art brands, and eclipses local artists.

Much of today’s art is avant-garde-style gesture: Modernist idiom undercut with irony. The artists of The Global Art Compass typify the avant-garde endgame mentality, whereby the artist seeks to position themselves in one unoccupied corner in a field of practice that is hugely expanded yet already nearly mapped. Apparently diverse as this selection is, there is not one work in this book that appears to be the outcome of genuine inquiry or struggle or that produced results that were unexpected. As such, this book very accurately captures art that is found on the global art fair circuit.

Western Art and the Wider World, Paul Wood, Wiley-Blackwell, 314pp, £19.99, €24 (pb) and The Global Art Compass: New Directions in 21st-century Art, Alistair Hicks, Thames & Hudson, 224pp, £18.95 (hb)

More from The Art Newspaper


5 Jan 15
16:9 CET


Actually Adams mentions critics LIKE Ruskin and Greenberg, (there have been others) only to point to a formalist agenda. As the review more accurately states – ‘critics are afraid to discuss the visual properties of art’ – that is, intrinsic properties of painting, photography, installation, etc. The drift to post modernist thinking can dismiss this as hopelessly fundamentalist or absolutist, but the coherence of a post-structuralist model is equally flawed. Hicks likes to remind us that he dabbled in philosophy at some point, but dabbling, most assuredly is all it was.

21 May 14
15:11 CET


Thank you for Alexander Adams' review of Global Art Compass. He laments the decline of criticism, and a system that is ' consigning revanchist bourgeois aesthetics to the dustbin of history.' Who talks like that any longer? He then mentions Greenberg and Ruskin with a fondness that I am sure many have, but neither of those old dictators are going to help us engage with the thankfully constantly changing ideas and aesthetics of today's artists. Then of the nearly two hundreds artists I mention in the book he picks out the most familiar and questions the purpose of the book. The purpose is to break down such narrow thinking. But thank you the subject deserves greater debate. Alistair Hicks Author of Global Art Compass

19 May 14
10:21 CET


Too true but all is not lost/flat/directionless financial "western Buddhism". Camille Paglia and Slavoj Zizek are great cultural and political critics. The artists Akiane Kramarik,Stella Vine,Sarah Maple,Pussy Riot and Femen may or may not make it into the new BBC remake/update of the famous 1969 `Civilisation` tv series . Lord Ken Clark could well have agreed with my choices here! TJ Clarke too. My website is Gothic Moon Records. " the future will be utopian or there will be none." This is what is unique to the 21st century.

Submit a comment

All comments are moderated. If you would like your comment to be approved, please use your real name, not a pseudonym. We ask for your email address in case we wish to contact you - it will not be made public and we do not use it for any other purpose.


Want to write a longer comment to this article? Email


Share this