Turkey

Why the Roman spa town of Allianoi must be saved

We continue to believe that it is still not too late for Turkish political leaders to take necessary action to avoid such a cultural tragedy to take place. Allianoi need not be sacrificed

The ancient site of Allianoi is being threatened by the construction of a dam

The most recent reports from Turkey about the Roman spa complex of Allianoi, sent by the local Allianoi Initiative led by the archaeologist professor Ahmet Yaras, says that now only the tops of excavated walls and columns poke through sand that workers employed by the Turkish State Waterworks are laying. This outstanding Roman archaeological site is being made ready to be submerged under water as work resumes on the controversial Yortanli dam. If the dam's construction goes ahead and the valley flooded to create a reservoir, ancient history will be lost by an irrigation scheme with an expected life-span of only 50 years.

Excavated by archaeologists only relatively recently, the ancient spa complex of Allianoi near Bergama in western Turkey has already revealed many historically rich monuments, including the thermal baths, bridges, streets and dwellings, and provided important scientific insights into Roman art, architecture, engineering, hydrology, medicine and pharmacology. Enlarged by the Emperor Hadrian, Allianoi dates mainly from the 2nd century AD, a time of emerging urban centers in Anatolia and of the construction of the famous Asklepion of nearby Pergamon.

In breach of international covenants

Europa Nostra immediately renewed its plea to leading Turkish politicians to save the site when we heard that work had begun to bury Allianoi in sand, in preparation for its flooding. We also informed the European Commission, European Parliament, Council of Europe and Unesco of our plea. We re-iterated our firm belief that should Allianoi disappear first under sand and then under water, this would constitute a breach of international regulations and covenants signed by Turkey, and would be contrary to the country’s own court injunctions. This latest plea continues our long-standing campaign in support of Allianoi and of finding alternative solutions to save it. In 2007, we joined forces with the International Council on Monuments and Sites and the European Association of Archaeologists to launch a public appeal to save Allianoi. So far, the combined local, national and European campaigns have managed to delay the dam. We now fear that the moment when Allianoi will be lost is drawing closer and closer.

Alternatives to flooding the site

Back in 2006, the Turkish minister of culture set up a special scientific committee that recommended a series of alternative conservation measures which could be undertaken at Allianoi if the valley was flooded. These included the protection of the site as a sunken island by the construction of an earth wall, or the relocation of some of the archaeological site’s most important structures. These recommendations brought some hope for the future of Allianoi.

We deeply regret that the Turkish government did not take those recommendations duly into consideration. Instead, it seems to have remained deaf to local, national, European and international pleas from concerned citizens and professionals alike. Yet, we continue to believe that it is still not too late for Turkish political leaders to take necessary action to avoid such a cultural tragedy to take place. Allianoi need not be sacrificed.

Lost opportunity

In Allianoi, the issues at stake are clear: a significant European cultural heritage site will be lost along with the potential for tourism-led economic development in the area. Tourism based on the unsustainable model of large hotels on sandy beaches, might benefit those on the narrow strip alongside its coast but not Turkey's vast interior. Sites such as Allianoi, which could be developed into a cultural and health tourism centre, would give deeper cultural and social meaning to the economic benefits of tourism, and would offer an example to follow also to other countries in the wider region, from Bulgaria to Syria.

What will be lost is not only a site of archaeological importance, but also a tremendous opportunity for sustainable development. Turkey has an embarrassment of architectural and archaeological riches, from the Roman era to Justinian churches and Ottoman mosques. But the quantity and scale of these remains is no reason to deliberately sacrifice others such as Allianoi. The opportunity these sites represent—Allianoi included—is that of development led by sustainable tourism. Such alternatives require vision, long-term policy, bravery and leadership on the part of the government, but will undoubtedly pay dividends for Turkey and for the rest of Europe.

Dams versus cultural heritage

The construction of hydroelectric dams and power stations in the Black Sea region is one of the main threats towards the cultural heritage of the ancient Mesopotamia region where river basins begot important centres of civilisation which lasted for thousands of years. Already, in south-east Turkey important cities such as Samsat have been affected by dams, and currently Hasankeyf with its important symbolic meaning for the Kurds, is similarly being threatened.

Big construction firms and the support of international and national banks allow the financing and building of such mega-projects in Turkey. The environmental movement and Turkey’s fledgling heritage organisations are unfortunately still too weak when matched against big businesses and the politicians at national and regional levels who support such projects.

The question of future water supply is going to be a difficult one for Turkey. The careful harvesting and marshalling of water can and should be balanced with Turkey’s other precious resource: its phenomenally rich and diverse cultural heritage, the potential of which has only been partially unfolded. The future prize—an expanding but sustainable tourism development beyond the coastal strip based on the respect and understanding of our common European heritage—must be worth it.

The writer is the secretary general of Europa Nostra, a European federation of heritage organisations committed to raise awareness of the value of Europe’s cultural heritage and to work to protect it for present and future generations.

www.europanostra.org

More from The Art Newspaper

Comments

17 Nov 10
14:43 CET

PAVEL AGAFONOV THE ARTIST, MOSCOW

This is outrages! It is not the first time in the history of mankind that one destroys the art and cultural site. But it is very sad.

6 Oct 10
14:46 CET

LEONIE BURGER, BRUSSELS, BELGIUM

I couldn't believe my ears when I heard that this gorgeous site will be flooded after all the pleas and contacts with "authorities"! This is no way to treat our heritage. It is like throwing away the bones of our ancesters. How dare we? It is quite frustrating to find that everything on this planet has to make way for politics and money. Average lifespan of any dam is 80 years, as I learned, and this one is calculated to last only for 50 years. Is it really worth being built? Enough dammage has been done on other locations already, like Zeugma for instance. What will it take to stop this madeness of building damns that in the end only scar and deplete the land?

Submit a comment

All comments are moderated. If you would like your comment to be approved, please use your real name, not a pseudonym. We ask for your email address in case we wish to contact you - it will not be made public and we do not use it for any other purpose.

Email*
 
Name*
 
City*
 
Comment*
 

Want to write a longer comment to this article? Email letters@theartnewspaper.com

 

Share this