Digital Editions
Newsletters
Subscribe
Digital Editions
Newsletters
Art market
Museums & heritage
Exhibitions
Books
Podcasts
Columns
Art of Luxury
Adventures with Van Gogh
Venice Biennale
Art market
Museums & heritage
Exhibitions
Books
Podcasts
Columns
Art of Luxury
Adventures with Van Gogh
Venice Biennale
Kazimir Malevich
archive

Correcting Malévich’s own disinformation

Conference papers of the 1988-89 touring exhibition are scutinised

1 February 1992
Share

Kazimir Malévich was one of the great innovators in twentieth-century art, notably for his creation of the abstract language of brightly-coloured geometrical forms floating against white space which he christened Suprematism. Unexpectedly, in the late Twenties, he painted portraits in a naturalistic style derived from the early Renaissance and began a series of pictures of peasants with featureless faces and bodies expressed in geometrical forms. This and other aspects of Malévich’s career urgently need consideration.

Soviet art historians trying to assess Malévich’s achievements have been frustrated by the fact that there are comparatively few Suprematist works in their country. In 1927 he toured Poland and Germany with a large selection of his pictures. Unexpectedly he returned home leaving them behind. Apart from several which went to the United States they were hidden from the Nazis until they were sold to the Stedelijk Museum, Amsterdam, in the 1950s. After his death in 1935 his Suprematist works remaining in the Soviet Union were neglected or destroyed.

In 1988-89 a great assembly from collections all over the world was exhibited in Amsterdam, Moscow and Leningrad. Making full use of the event a conference was held in the latter city during which Soviet and foreign scholars read papers of which only six are printed here, together with an essay by Malévich which gives some idea of the waffle to which he was prone.

These talks aimed to correct the myths Malévich created about his career by publishing misleading autobiographical accounts and falsely dating his pictures.

They also tried to determine why Malévich turned away from abstract Suprematism and painted the last enigmatic works—not so enigmatic, perhaps, if the speakers had looked at Picasso’s neoclassical period and Malévich’s contemporaries such as Pakulin and Pakhomov. These papers are helpful and informative and the book is well illustrated, but with less than sixty pages of text it is decidedly expensive.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

Kazimir MalevichNazi GermanySoviet UnionSuprematism
Share
Subscribe to The Art Newspaper’s digital newsletter for your daily digest of essential news, views and analysis from the international art world delivered directly to your inbox.
Newsletter subscribe
Information
About
Contact
Cookie policy
Data protection
Privacy policy
Frequently Asked Questions
Subscription T&Cs
Terms and conditions
Advertise
Sister Papers
Sponsorship policy
Follow us
Instagram
Bluesky
LinkedIn
Facebook
TikTok
YouTube
© The Art Newspaper

Related content

Kazimir Malevicharchive
1 March 2010

Matisse to Malevich: Pioneers of Modern Art from the Hermitage

The exhibition underlines art history’s—and the Hermitage’s—debt to Ivan Morozov and Sergej Shchukin who commissioned and collected many of the works

James Hobbs
Kazimir Malevicharchive
31 March 2001

A failing Russian bank exposes a climate of fear and suspicion over ownership of Malevich’s “Black Square”

The painting is currently with Russia's Culture Ministry, though Malevich's heirs dispute the bank's original ownership

John Varoli
Kazimir Malevicharchive
1 November 2014

"Ridiculous" case involving possible Malevich, Suetin, and Chashnik fakes continues

The lawsuit, dating back to 2009, is between Russian dealer Gary Tatintsian and Lev Nussberg, an artist, art historian and collector

Charlotte Burns
Kazimir Malevicharchive
31 August 2013

'Kazimir Malevich and the Russian Avant Garde': an exhibition which recognises that Malevich's radical Suprematism was framed by Impressionism

"Malevich’s early figurative paintings reveal his debt to Monet and Renoir"

Eddy Frankel