Digital Editions
Newsletters
Subscribe
Digital Editions
Newsletters
Art market
Museums & heritage
Exhibitions
Books
Podcasts
Columns
Art of Luxury
Adventures with Van Gogh
Venice Biennale
Art market
Museums & heritage
Exhibitions
Books
Podcasts
Columns
Art of Luxury
Adventures with Van Gogh
Venice Biennale
Art market
archive

SBC Warburg offer for Christie’s abandoned

It is presumed that investors prepared to pay an acceptable price could not be found

The Art Newspaper
1 March 1998
Share

As this issue went to press, the news arrived that Christie’s had abandoned discussions with SBC Warburg regarding a possible recommended offer for the auction house, presumably because investors prepared to pay an acceptable price could not be found. The 1997 results for the Christie’s Group showed that while its auction totals were higher than Sotheby’s ($2.16 billion as against 1.6 billion), its net profit was lower ($37.1 million against $40.6 million). The ratio of auction revenues to auction sales fell from 18% in 1996 to 16.7% in 1997. This was a consequence of the increased proportion of high-value consignments, which earn lower rates of seller’s commission and buyer’s premium. Like Sotheby’s, there was an exceptional negative in the accounts: $8.48 million was written off because a loan had been made against the security of “an unusual but important collection”. Due to “a substantial delay” in bringing this collection to sale, during which prices in the market concerned have fallen. Spink, which forms part of the group, registered a loss of $1.28 million in 1997 as against a profit of $2.7 million in 1996, in part because “it was judged necessary to write down the value of older fine art stock by $2.7 million, principally in the field of Asian art”.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

Art marketSotheby'sChristie'sWarburg
Share
Subscribe to The Art Newspaper’s digital newsletter for your daily digest of essential news, views and analysis from the international art world delivered directly to your inbox.
Newsletter subscribe
Information
About
Contact
Cookie policy
Data protection
Privacy policy
Frequently Asked Questions
Subscription T&Cs
Terms and conditions
Advertise
Sister Papers
Sponsorship policy
Follow us
Instagram
Bluesky
LinkedIn
Facebook
TikTok
YouTube
© The Art Newspaper

Related content

Art marketarchive
1 March 2011

Auction guarantees are dividing the art trade

Insurance for sellers or market manipulation?

Georgina Adam and Charlotte Burns
Art marketarchive
30 April 1996

Chinese privatise their auction scene

Rapid advances as new companies model their catalogues and conditions of sale on Western models

J. David Murphy
February 2008archive
1 February 2000

Is another bubble about to burst in the fine art market?

In 2000 we noted that single-owner collections sent prices spiralling upwards which was good news for the salerooms, but disastrous for museums with dwindling budgets

The Art Newspaper
Art marketanalysis
3 April 2024

Sotheby’s new fee structure is a highwire act of risk and reward

Auction house’s bold changes that favour buyers could bolster profits—or they could backfire

Scott Reyburn