Digital Editions
Newsletters
Subscribe
Digital Editions
Newsletters
Art market
Museums & heritage
Exhibitions
Books
Podcasts
Columns
Art of Luxury
Adventures with Van Gogh
Venice Biennale
Art market
Museums & heritage
Exhibitions
Books
Podcasts
Columns
Art of Luxury
Adventures with Van Gogh
Venice Biennale
Fakes & copies
archive

Infamous faker Guy Hain's bronzes sold at auction

Should the contents of his studio have been sold or destroyed?

The Art Newspaper
1 January 2004
Share

A most extraordinary auction went virtually unnoticed in Paris last November. The view was for just four hours, and the sale was held in the little known Salle des Ventes des Domaines, which disposes of property impounded by the French State.

On the block were 153 lots of 19th-century bronzes described as “originals and reproductions”, but the true source of the pieces was not given. They were in fact just some of a huge hoard seized from the notorious faker Guy Hain, currently in prison in France for producing thousands of fake bronzes (see The Art Newspaper, No. 117, September 2001, p.67).

The sale contained a mix of genuine and fake objects by and after Barye, Mène, Bonheur, Rodin and many others, for Guy Hain had bought good pieces when he was still dealing in the Louvre des Antiquaires, and had also used genuine pieces to copy. The French State preempted two lots before the sale, both works by Fratin. Estimates were extremely low, starting at only E25 ($21, £17), and the whole sale totalled just E230,000, with many of the reproduction pieces failing to find buyers.

Those dealers and specialists who did hear about the sale were shocked that the French State could put known fakes on the market, even though they had been stamped with “reproduction”. “The stamp was very faint and could easily be removed,” noted Sotheby’s specialist Alex Kader. “I think they should have been destroyed. Some of them were of very good quality; in fact, for me it was a good opportunity to handle Hain bronzes and get to know them, in case any come on to the market.”

This, of course, is the main worry: that unscrupulous traders may pass these works off as genuine. The bronze market was badly hit after the Hain affair was first revealed, and took a long time to recover. Now, however, with greater awareness and documentation (particularly since the publication of the catalogue raisonné of Barye by Alain Richarme), dealers and auction houses are less likely to handle duds—or so they claim.

Alain Richarme of the Paris gallery L’Univers du Bronze said, “It is extraordinary: the State puts the Hain works on sale, gets the proceeds of the sale, even withdraws two pieces for museums, and already receives payment for reproduction rights for Rodin’s work!” He did not, however, think the market would be affected: “The fakes are easy to identify,” he said. G.A.

Originally appeared in The Art Newspaper as: Faker's bronzes sold at auction

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

Fakes & copiesArt marketReproductions
Share
Subscribe to The Art Newspaper’s digital newsletter for your daily digest of essential news, views and analysis from the international art world delivered directly to your inbox.
Newsletter sign-up
Information
About
Contact
Cookie policy
Data protection
Privacy policy
Frequently Asked Questions
Subscription T&Cs
Terms and conditions
Advertise
Sister Papers
Sponsorship policy
Follow us
Instagram
Bluesky
LinkedIn
Facebook
TikTok
YouTube
© The Art Newspaper

Related content

Fakes & copiesarchive
31 May 1992

Following the Rodin fakes scandal French bronze founders act to protect their good name

The Syndicat concluded that French legislation is incomplete in its definitions of reproductions and forgery

The Art Newspaper
Art marketarchive
30 September 2001

How has the Hain affair affected the market?

Prices have never been higher, but selectivity is vital

Georgina Adam