Digital Editions
Newsletters
Subscribe
Digital Editions
Newsletters
Art market
Museums & heritage
Exhibitions
Books
Podcasts
Columns
Technology
Adventures with Van Gogh
Art market
Museums & heritage
Exhibitions
Books
Podcasts
Columns
Technology
Adventures with Van Gogh
Chicago
archive

Possible US sanctions on Iran could create back door for commandeering of museum antiquities as damages

Persepolis tablets on loan to Chicago's Oriental Institute since the 1930s compromised in lawsuit brought by victims of Jerusalem suicide bombing

Martha Lufkin
1 March 2012
Share

Chicago

A proposed US law to impose sanctions on Iran could make it much easier for people who have a claim for damages against Iran to seize Iranian antiquities and art held in US museums as compensation. The amendment, part of a bill approved by the Senate banking committee last month, has a provision that could, unintentionally, affect a case involving antiquities at the University of Chicago’s Oriental Institute.

The measure would “make it easier for individuals to seize and auction off priceless ancient Persian antiquities” held at US museums to satisfy court judgments, says the National Iranian American Council, a Washington, DC, non-profit group. The bill poses a threat to a collection of ancient clay tablets known as the Persepolis tablets, owned by Iran and on loan to the University of Chicago since 1937. The objects contain valuable records of daily transactions in Persia. The council is urging constituents to contact Congress to alter the amendment to exclude cultural property at US museums and universities.

Culture or commerce?

The bill would render obsolete the “commercial activity” test, which hampers complainants seeking to seize assets in cases against foreign nations in US courts. Under the US Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, a foreign nation can be sued and, under certain conditions, its US assets seized. For this to happen, proof may be required that the property of the foreign nation was used for a “commercial activity” in the US.

Tricia Enright, the communications director for Senator Robert Menendez (Democrat, New Jersey), who is backing the amendment, says that it is intended to define Iran’s property interests to include “certain security and financial assets” and to deem such interests “a commercial activity”.

Menendez’s proposal cites “any” property owned by Iran in the US, making no distinction “between seizing Iran’s financial assets and seizing artefacts from museums”, says David Elliott, the assistant policy director at the

Iranian-American council. “We can preserve the right of victims without putting irreplaceable Persian antiquities into auction.” He says: “This is a threat not just to Persian antiquities, but also to all museums that engage in international exchanges.”

A spokesman for the University of Chicago says that while most of the Persepolis find has been returned to Iran after being restored, around 20,000 objects are still on loan for research.

The Persepolis tablets are at the heart of an ongoing case against the Oriental Institute, in which several people are seeking the antiquities as part of a $77m court judgment against Iran for injuries they sustained in a 1997 terrorist bombing in Jerusalem. A 2003 default judgment in Washington, DC, was based on Iran’s failure to appear and defend itself in the legal case.

Patty Gerstenblith, a professor at DePaul University law school, says that while she condemns any terrorist act, it would not be “logical” for Congress “to view deprivation of archaeological artefacts on loan from a foreign nation, even a state sponsor of terrorism, as a means of carrying out sanctions against that nation. Ancient artefacts owned by a nation are not a financial resource that can be used to fund and encourage terrorist activities.”

The US government has filed a statement of interest in the Oriental Institute case, urging the court to affirm Iran’s immunity in the case. No schedule has been set to send the bill to the Senate for a vote.

Originally appeared in The Art Newspaper as 'US sanctions on Iran could create back door to seize museum antiquities'

ChicagoLawAntiquities & ArchaeologyRestitutionIranUSAAmerican MuseumsOriental Institute
Share
Subscribe to The Art Newspaper’s digital newsletter for your daily digest of essential news, views and analysis from the international art world delivered directly to your inbox.
Newsletter sign-up
Information
About
Contact
Cookie policy
Data protection
Privacy policy
Frequently Asked Questions
Subscription T&Cs
Terms and conditions
Advertise
Sister Papers
Sponsorship policy
Follow us
Instagram
Bluesky
LinkedIn
Facebook
TikTok
YouTube
© The Art Newspaper

Related content

Lawnews
2 October 2017

US court to decide on terror victims’ claim on lent artefacts

Eight US citizens injured in a terrorist attack are trying to seize Persian antiquities on loan from Iran to a museum in Chicago

Martha Lufkin
Lawnews
22 February 2018

Terror victims cannot seize Iranian antiquities, US Supreme Court rules

A 2008 amendment to the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act does not open a foreign nation's assets to claimants, the justices unanimously decided

Martha Lufkin