Digital Editions
Newsletters
Subscribe
Digital Editions
Newsletters
Art market
Museums & heritage
Exhibitions
Books
Podcasts
Columns
Technology
Adventures with Van Gogh
Art market
Museums & heritage
Exhibitions
Books
Podcasts
Columns
Technology
Adventures with Van Gogh
Law
news

Ibrahim Mahama countersues art dealers Stefan Simchowitz and Jonathan Ellis King

In response to lawsuit filed because he would not authenticate 300-piece series, Ghanaian artist argues they “mutilated” his jute sack work and sold parts without authorisation

Anny Shaw
3 April 2016
Share

The Ghanaian artist Ibrahim Mahama has filed a countersuit in his ongoing legal battle with the Los Angeles dealer and artist agent Stefan Simchowitz and the Dublin dealer Jonathan Ellis King. The case centres on six lots of jute sack material, which Mahama sold to Simchowitz and Ellis King for £90,000 in 2013. The artist repurposes the coarse brown sacks that are used to transport coal in Ghana, stitching them together to create tapestry-like installations.

Mahama claims that Simchowitz and Ellis King “mutilated” his work by cutting it up into around 300 pieces, and stretching and framing them to sell individually “all without any required written authorisation” from the artist. The countersuit, filed on 22 March, alleges the dealers violated the 1990 Visual Artists Rights Act, which protects an artist from “any intentional distortion, mutilation, or other modification of the work”.

Mahama is also seeking an injunction preventing them from selling any more of the works. After a 2014 exhibition, 27 pieces were sold at around $16,700 each. “Mahama signed over 200 examples of the works so I have no idea how VARA even applies,” Simchowitz says.

The dealers first filed a lawsuit in June 2015, claiming that Mahama’s declaration that the works are inauthentic could potentially cost them $4.5m—what they estimate to be the value of the unsold works. They say Mahama orally agreed to create “a series of smaller, unique art works” from four of the six lots of jute material, which they would have “the exclusive right to sell”. According to the original complaint, Mahama signed the 294 “individual works” at Ellis King’s gallery.

Simchowitz and Ellis King are demanding the artist authenticate the works. They also allege Mahama breached an agreement by secretly creating a new series similar to the stretched works and selling them to a collector in Los Angeles. Mahama says he is due to travel to Los Angeles at the end of the month for mediation. “I am not sure of the outcome yet, but I will stand by the integrity of my practice whichever way,” he says.

Law
Share
Subscribe to The Art Newspaper’s digital newsletter for your daily digest of essential news, views and analysis from the international art world delivered directly to your inbox.
Newsletter sign-up
Information
About
Contact
Cookie policy
Data protection
Privacy policy
Frequently Asked Questions
Subscription T&Cs
Terms and conditions
Advertise
Sister Papers
Sponsorship policy
Follow us
Instagram
Bluesky
LinkedIn
Facebook
TikTok
YouTube
© The Art Newspaper

Related content

News
10 May 2016

Stefan Simchowitz settles bitter legal case with Ibrahim Mahama

Los Angeles agent and Dublin dealer Jonathan Ellis King sued artist for declaring jute sack works were not authentic

Anny Shaw
Newsarchive
31 July 2008

Artist John Chamberlain can be sued over disputed Warhol, says Judge

Former Factory assistant claims he made the disputed work

Martha Lufkin