Digital Editions
Newsletters
Subscribe
Digital Editions
Newsletters
Art market
Museums & heritage
Exhibitions
Books
Podcasts
Columns
Technology
Adventures with Van Gogh
Art market
Museums & heritage
Exhibitions
Books
Podcasts
Columns
Technology
Adventures with Van Gogh
Artists
news

Damien Hirst’s formaldehyde works are not harmful after all

Author retracts report claiming works shown at Tate Modern were a risk

Gareth Harris
18 July 2016
Share

A report published earlier this year which claimed that the fumes from Damien Hirst’s formaldehyde works, shown at Tate Modern in 2012, were putting people at risk has been retracted by one of its authors who now says that the findings are “inaccurate and unreliable”. 

A scientific research team led by Pier Giorgio Righetti, a professor of chemistry at Milan Polytechnic, monitored the levels of formaldehyde at the Tate show, which was used to preserve works such as Mother and Child Divided, made up of four tanks containing a bisected cow and calf, and Away from the Flock, comprising a lamb suspended in a tank. 

Righetti has subsequently said that he is retracting the paper, entitled Remote sensing of formaldehyde fumes in indoor environments, which was published online earlier this year by the London-based Royal Society of Chemistry in its journal Analytical Methods. 

Philippa Hughes, the executive editor of Analytical Methods, says: “Further to the expression of concern we published last week, we are following due process towards retraction, in line with our ethical publishing policy and in consultation with the authors."

Righetti's research team initially said that readings of the chemical in the gallery, recorded at five parts per million were in excess of European Union regulations, which set the limit at 0.5 parts per million.

A spokeswoman for Hirst says that the artist’s company, Science Ltd, investigated the claims, consulting with the professor of physical chemistry at Oxford University, Claire Vallance. 

“Science Ltd and the authors of the paper co-operated to conduct further tests on formaldehyde works using the equipment referred to in the paper as well as commercially available equipment used by Science Ltd to test the presence of formaldehyde fumes,” she says.

None of the tests showed readings of formaldehyde higher than 0.1 parts per million. “It was agreed that there cannot have been formaldehyde present at the dangerously high levels originally cited in the paper and, accordingly, there was never any risk to the public,” the spokeswoman says. Righetti says that he regrets any alarm or concern caused by the findings. 

Artists
Share
Subscribe to The Art Newspaper’s digital newsletter for your daily digest of essential news, views and analysis from the international art world delivered directly to your inbox.
Newsletter sign-up
Information
About
Contact
Cookie policy
Data protection
Privacy policy
Frequently Asked Questions
Subscription T&Cs
Terms and conditions
Advertise
Sister Papers
Sponsorship policy
Follow us
Instagram
Bluesky
LinkedIn
Facebook
TikTok
YouTube
© The Art Newspaper

Related content

Damien Hirstarchive
30 June 2006

Damien Hirst in talks to replace rotting shark

The 1991 work, bought by Steve Cohen from Charles Saatchi for £6.5m, has deteriorated because of the way it was made

Cristina Ruiz and Gareth Harris
News
21 April 2016

Damien Hirst and Tate reject speculation that formaldehyde fumes were risky

Italian scientists who monitored artist's 2012 show at Tate Modern found levels in excess of EU regulations

Gareth Harris