Digital Editions
Newsletters
Subscribe
Digital Editions
Newsletters
Art market
Museums & heritage
Exhibitions
Books
Podcasts
Columns
Art of Luxury
Adventures with Van Gogh
Venice Biennale
Art market
Museums & heritage
Exhibitions
Books
Podcasts
Columns
Art of Luxury
Adventures with Van Gogh
Venice Biennale
Economics
news

The Met's new admissions fee goes into effect

Many visitors responded to the change with a shrug, although some were more critical of the mandatory charge

James H. Miller
1 March 2018
Share
The Metropolitan Museum of Art Photo: Steven Depolo

The Metropolitan Museum of Art Photo: Steven Depolo

The Metropolitan Museum of Art’s new admissions policy went into effect today (1 March), putting an end to its long-standing “pay-what-you-wish” entry for all museum visitors. The suggested donation now only applies to New York residents and Tri-State area students, leaving everyone else to pay $25 for general admission.

The museum prepared for any confusion by installing a plethora of informational signage, as well as staff carrying iPads on hand to sell tickets or direct visitors to the galleries. And either because of these efforts, or the fact that the new policy rolled out on a weekday, the Met’s Great Hall this afternoon was no more crowded than usual. Although it was perhaps a less congenial space, as metal queue barriers replaced the old wooden benches.

Outside, most museum-goers we interviewed responded to the change with a shrug. Daniel and Chelsea (who asked that their last names not be used) from Louisville, Kentucky had been unaware of the “pay-what-you-wish” policy until they were asked about it after their visit. They noted they had already spent three to four hours in the galleries. “We haven’t even hit half of it,” Daniel said. “I think it’s well worth $25.”

However, it may all boil down to one’s expectations. Visitors from outside the US responded less enthusiastically. “In Ireland, the museums don’t charge anything, so we’re not used to it,” said Margaret Rooney from Dungarvan. “It’s a little disappointing.” Some were more critical, such as the artist Ai Weiwei, who told the New York Times it was “like taking the jacket off a poor person. If they do this, I will never go to the Met. Am I calling for a boycott? No. But I myself will not go.”

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

EconomicsAttendanceMetropolitan Museum of Art
Share
Subscribe to The Art Newspaper’s digital newsletter for your daily digest of essential news, views and analysis from the international art world delivered directly to your inbox.
Newsletter subscribe
Information
About
Contact
Cookie policy
Data protection
Privacy policy
Frequently Asked Questions
Subscription T&Cs
Terms and conditions
Advertise
Sister Papers
Sponsorship policy
Follow us
Instagram
Bluesky
LinkedIn
Facebook
TikTok
YouTube
© The Art Newspaper

Related content

Visitor Figures 2018analysis
24 March 2019

Art's Most Popular: here are 2018's most visited shows and museums

Fashion continues upward trend in the US, shooting to the top of The Art Newspaper's chart, while the British Museum slips from the top spot in the UK

Emily Sharpe and José da Silva. Research compiled by Valentina Bin, Anna Musini and Vanessa Thill
Visitor Figures 2022news
27 March 2023

The Met down 1.7 million visitors compared to pre-pandemic level—the biggest drop of any US art museum

The New York institution, usually the most popular art museum in the US, was overtaken in 2022 by the National Gallery of Art in Washington, DC

José da Silva
Visitor Figures 2018news
26 March 2019

Heavenly figures: how two Met shows topped The Art Newspaper’s attendance survey

The New York museum's Heavenly Bodies exhibition came first even though curator “never set out to create a hit”

Helen Stoilas and Nancy Kenney