Digital Editions
Newsletters
Subscribe
Digital Editions
Newsletters
Art market
Museums & heritage
Exhibitions
Books
Podcasts
Columns
Art of Luxury
Adventures with Van Gogh
Venice Biennale
Art market
Museums & heritage
Exhibitions
Books
Podcasts
Columns
Art of Luxury
Adventures with Van Gogh
Venice Biennale
Copyright
news

US singer Chris Brown accused of ripping off several artists’ work in Wobble Up music video

Marius Sperlich and Tony Futura are among those calling for greater copyright protection in the creative industry

Anny Shaw
22 May 2019
Share
Chris Brown has been accused of copying artists' work in his latest music video

Chris Brown has been accused of copying artists' work in his latest music video

The US singer and songwriter Chris Brown has come under fire for copying several artists’ work in his sexually suggestive Wobble Up music video, featuring Nicki Minaj and G-Eazy. Brown and his frequent collaborator Arrad directed the video, which was released on Monday.

The German artist Marius Sperlich immediately took to social media to say two of his works from 2018–one showing a breast with a temperature dial for a nipple and the other of buttocks poking out of the water to resemble a tropical island–had been used without credit. The Berlin-based digital artist Tony Futura also claims his lemon breasts, one of them pierced with a silver ring, have been copied, as have unspecified works by the London-based photographers Vanessa Mckeown and Catherine Losing.

Posting on Instagram, Sperlich says that intellectual property must be “protected at any cost”, particularly now that social media allows content to be share instantly and without credit. “For many the internet is just an open source of concepts, ideas and free content,” he says. “Nobody cares about creation, originals and credit anymore. Especially if you are a young and an emerging artist… most can’t afford a lawyer for a lawsuit. So most of them remain silent. We won’t stay silent.”

Sperlich says he is in touch with the production company behind the video. “However, this situation is unfortunately not the first time this has happened to me and my work and neither am I the only artist suffering under plagiarism and theft of IP.” Brown did not respond to a request for comment by the time of publication.

Sperlich is now calling for other artists whose work has been copied to share their stories using the hashtag #changeindustry. “Stop accepting mistreatment in the fear of being blackballed in the industry,” he urges. “If you stay silent, you enable them. Credit where it’s due!”

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

CopyrightMusic
Share
Subscribe to The Art Newspaper’s digital newsletter for your daily digest of essential news, views and analysis from the international art world delivered directly to your inbox.
Newsletter subscribe
Information
About
Contact
Cookie policy
Data protection
Privacy policy
Frequently Asked Questions
Subscription T&Cs
Terms and conditions
Advertise
Sister Papers
Sponsorship policy
Follow us
Instagram
Bluesky
LinkedIn
Facebook
TikTok
YouTube
© The Art Newspaper

Related content

Robert Indiananews
29 April 2020

Robert Indiana’s LOVE at centre of new $150m fraud claim

American Image Art founder alleges certain works are in the public domain and cannot be copyrighted

Anny Shaw
Art marketnews
20 May 2021

Not laughing now: Banksy loses second trademark case over famous monkey image

Ruling slams British street artist for “sham efforts” in trying to mislead the European Union Intellectual Property Office

Anny Shaw
Art marketnews
25 April 2019

EU copyright crackdown is intended to protect artists, but might it damage their market instead?

New laws to stop copyrighted material from being uploaded to social media without permission could pose problems for those using sites like Instagram to sell art

Anny Shaw
Friezearchive
30 September 2010

The work of art in the age of cut and paste

Can the law keep up with the speed of digital appropriation, reproduction and distribution? And should it even try?

Anny Shaw