Digital Editions
Newsletters
Subscribe
Digital Editions
Newsletters
Art market
Museums & heritage
Exhibitions
Books
Podcasts
Columns
Technology
Adventures with Van Gogh
Art market
Museums & heritage
Exhibitions
Books
Podcasts
Columns
Technology
Adventures with Van Gogh
Art law
news

Number of Manhattan's park art vendors can be limited by New York City, court rules

Appeals court says that guidelines limiting number of sellers in four green spaces are constitutional

Margaret Carrigan
22 August 2019
Share
A mother and child walk by stalls selling art in Union Square, New York Photo: PJ Norman

A mother and child walk by stalls selling art in Union Square, New York Photo: PJ Norman

A New York state appeals court ruled Tuesday that New York City guidelines limiting the number of art vendors in four major Manhattan parks are constitutional. The decision overturns an injunction against the rules filed in 2017 by a group of vendors, among them several local visual artists.

The court’s decision rejected the plaintiffs’ claim that New York City Department of Parks and Recreation’s expressive matter vending (EMV) rules limiting the number of vendors in four popular parks—High Line Park, Battery Park, Union Square Park and Central Park south of 86th Street—violate their free speech and equal protection rights under the state constitution, ultimately having “a discriminatory effect”, according to the court papers, which noted that “at least one plaintiff is over age 40 and several are women”.

Lawyers for the department argued that the EMV rules promote the public health, safety and welfare in the designated parks. Judge Barbara Kapnick upheld this claim, calling the rules “an appropriate response to demonstrated concerns” about congestion, and found that the plaintiffs presented no support for their discrimination claims.

The decision comes almost a decade after the city adopted the contentious rules limiting the number of vendors of “expressive matter” such as paintings, photos, newspapers and books. The guidelines cap the number at 100, or 140 on days the Greenmarket in Union Square is not operating—a substantial reduction from the roughly 300 permitted previously.

Artists vehemently opposed the rules when they were introduced. “A park without art is like eating spaghetti without spaghetti sauce,” Aleksandar Milenkovic, a vendor of oil pastels in Union Square, told the New York Times in 2010.

The department allows vendors in the restricted areas to sell on a first-come, first-served basis. In 2013, Manhattan’s federal appeals court also rejected a challenge to the rules under the US Constitution, whose free speech clause is narrower than the one in New York’s constitution.

Art lawLawNew YorkSales
Share
Subscribe to The Art Newspaper’s digital newsletter for your daily digest of essential news, views and analysis from the international art world delivered directly to your inbox.
Newsletter sign-up
Information
About
Contact
Cookie policy
Data protection
Privacy policy
Frequently Asked Questions
Subscription T&Cs
Terms and conditions
Advertise
Sister Papers
Sponsorship policy
Follow us
Instagram
Bluesky
LinkedIn
Facebook
TikTok
YouTube
© The Art Newspaper

Related content

Art lawnews
23 January 2023

Is the graphic designer who refuses to create websites for same-sex couples an artist?

US Supreme Court justices debate whether obliging a Colorado woman to create wedding websites for same-sex couples violates her free speech rights as an artist

Daniel Grant
Lawnews
13 April 2020

New York court rules Call of Duty video game as art

The gaming publisher Activision is protected under the First Amendment to use the Humvee vehicle brand “if realism is an artistic goal"

Riah Pryor