Tate, the Victoria & Albert Museum (V&A) and the Centre Pompidou have defended their partnerships with state-owned companies in China in the face of mounting criticism of the country’s extensive human rights abuses.
All three are collaborating or consulting on major projects in China with development firms owned by the state. They say that sharing their collections and expertise in this way “can help to foster tolerance and curiosity” (Pompidou); “generates greater understanding between global cultures and communities” (V&A), and helps “increase Chinese people’s access to the possibilities of international art” (Tate).
Such partnerships also make a significant contribution to these museums’ balance sheets, at a time when commercial revenues are under enormous pressure. The Pompidou, for example, is being paid €20.75m for its collaboration with the West Bund Group in Shanghai. As part of the deal, the Parisian institution opened a branch in Shanghai last November and will organise exhibitions there drawn from its collections in Paris. And while the British Museum has not entered into any partnerships with state-owned firms, its collaboration with the e-commerce giant Alibaba shows just how desirable the market is. In 2018 alone, the British Museum generated nearly $30m via Alibaba’s online licensing platform Alfilo Brands, which sells British Museum branded products in China.
[Disclosure: The Art Newspaper also has an independent franchise in China, owned by Modern Media Group Holdings, which is listed on the Hong Kong stock exchange.]
But now, artists and human rights groups are increasingly questioning partnerships with state-owned firms in China in light of growing evidence of the detention of an estimated one million Muslim Uyghurs in the Xinjiang region; the crackdown on protestors in Hong Kong; pervasive state censorship; and other widespread abuses perpetrated by the Chinese Communist Party under President Xi Jinping. (The party has rejected criticism of its Uyghur detention camps, describing them as job training centres.)
“We are talking about a regime that has flagrantly broken an international treaty in regard to Hong Kong; that is accused of atrocious crimes with regards to the Uyghurs; and that has been accused of removing organs from Falun Gong prisoners while they are still alive. So I would urge all our public institutions and museums who have partnered with the Chinese state to rethink these relationships,” says Benedict Rogers, the co-founder of Hong Kong Watch, an advocacy group.
In a report published in July by Human Rights Watch, a non-governmental organisation, the group’s executive director, Kenneth Roth, argues that the “quiet diplomacy” favoured by Western politicians in China “does nothing to shame a government that seeks acceptance as a legitimate and respected member of the international community. Instead, the photo-ops of smiling officials combined with the public silence on human rights signal to the world—and to the people of China—that the VIP visitor is indifferent to Beijing’s repression.”
“If you do not question that power you become complicit”Ai Weiwei
Geoffrey Nice, a British prosecutor who chaired the China Tribunal in London, an independent panel set up to investigate evidence that the Chinese state is removing organs from Falun Gong prisoners while still alive to service a lucrative black-market trade, raised the issue of museum involvement in China when he delivered his final judgment in June 2019. He concludes his report with this warning: “Governments and any who interact in any substantial way with the PRC including…educational establishments [and] arts establishments should now recognise that they are...interacting with a criminal state.”
For the Chinese dissident artist Ai Weiwei, Nice’s statement is clear: “Any state or organisation, business or culture alike, involved with a state with such an extremely poor record on human rights, with divisive ideas about those most important values such as free speech, becomes a part of this power. If you do not question that power you become complicit,” he says. He is dismissive of Western museums’ claims to be promoting values of tolerance and free expression. “Most of them are in China purely for strategies of self-development, attempting to get away from the struggles facing institutions in the West,” the artist says.
For Ai, the Pompidou is “the perfect example” of a Western museum operating in China that is failing to represent its own, stated values. It has “loaned its works to Shanghai, a city under heavy Communist censorship. My name cannot even appear in museum shows in Shanghai. It is a city that has absolutely no moral foundation upon which art can exist,” he says.
The Pompidou president Serge Lasvignes’s response is that the museum and its staff in Shanghai “work independently with their Chinese counterparts to choose works, themes and exhibition set-ups. In compliance with Chinese law, exhibition content is approved by the authority in charge of cultural affairs. The authorisation and approval process may seem complex, but we do currently have sufficient freedom to be able to work with China. Should this cease to be the case, we would rescind our collaboration.”
Yaqiu Wang, a China researcher for Human Rights Watch, says that Western museums in China “should use their leverage. The Chinese government wants them there, they want the prestige of the association with some of the best-known museums in the world. If all museums got together and took a stand, they would have quite a lot of power. China could kick one museum out but they wouldn’t want to kick out everyone.”
Others argue that the presence of European museums in China benefits the Chinese people and that there is an enormous appetite there for shows drawn from European collections. An exhibition of landscape paintings on loan from Tate Britain to the Shanghai Museum in 2018 attracted a record 615,000 visitors in 14 weeks, more than 6,000 a day, making it Tate’s most visited exhibition to date in any venue.
“Cultural relations are normally people-to-people, rather than state-to-state, and it can be a good thing to open a window to other cultures and other ways of doing things even when state-to-state relations are very bad,” says Mark Jones, a former director of the V&A. “Cultural relations with the Soviet bloc during the Cold War were welcomed by the populations of those countries and may have had a part in raising and sustaining aspirations for a different life. They did not imply, and were not taken to imply, approval of or indifference to the evils of Communist dictatorship.”
“The V&A has large and important Chinese collections and has a duty where possible to maintain good links with academics in the field, including those in Chinese universities and museums,” Jones continues. “Understanding Chinese history and culture is important to all of us. And it may also be important to show aspects of our own culture in China. I am not arguing that there are never circumstances in which it is wrong to sustain cultural links—only that it is a difficult decision.”
Take three deals: who’s doing what in China?
Partner: Shanghai Lujiazui Group
Contract: three years
Value of deal: undisclosed
Scope: Tate is providing training and expertise to help develop the Pudong Museum of Art in Shanghai, which is scheduled to open to the public in 2021. Tate will also draw on its collections to send three exhibitions to the museum
Centre Pompidou, Paris
Partner: West Bund Group, Shanghai
Contract: five years
Value of deal: €2.75m per year plus €1.4m for branding rights per year
Scope: a branch opened in Shanghai in November 2019; during the term of its partnership, the Pompidou will organise all exhibitions at its Shanghai outpost by drawing from its own collections
Victoria & Albert Museum, London
Partner: China Merchants Group
Contract: five years; renewal in discussion
Value of deal: The V&A earned a net profit of at least £1.5m in the first four years of the partnership, according to its annual reports
Scope: Helped develop a new cultural centre in Shenzhen, which opened in 2017
• For an interview with Ai Weiwei on the subject see here
• For full responses from Tate, Victoria & Albert Museum and Pompidou, see here