Digital Editions
Newsletters
Subscribe
Digital Editions
Newsletters
Art market
Museums & heritage
Exhibitions
Books
Podcasts
Columns
Technology
Adventures with Van Gogh
Art market
Museums & heritage
Exhibitions
Books
Podcasts
Columns
Technology
Adventures with Van Gogh
Copyright infringement
news

KAWS wins nearly $1m in damages in counterfeit lawsuit

Artist Brian Donnelly first filed the lawsuit against Dylan Joy An Leong Yi Zhi in 2021

Carlie Porterfield
5 May 2023
Share
This KAWS-inspired backpack was listed as for sale on the defendant's website. Court documents

This KAWS-inspired backpack was listed as for sale on the defendant's website. Court documents

Brian Donnelly, better known as KAWS, was awarded $900,000 in damages this week by a court in New York after the artist filed a lawsuit in 2021 accusing a man in Singapore of reproducing KAWS works on hundreds of goods with a collective retail value of more than $63m.

The US Southern District Court of New York ordered Dylan Joy An Leong Yi Zhi and two Singaporean companies associated with him to stop producing the counterfeit goods featuring KAWS’s well-known Companion character, which is depicted in much of his work. The $900,000 awarded to KAWS is meant to offset “the effect that [Leong’s] counterfeiting has upon the market for plaintiffs’ goods, including the dilution of the products’ distinctiveness and disruption in the market for KAWS goods”, according to the ruling.

In the frame

Belieber in the KAWS: did Justin Bieber buy record painting?

Anna Brady

David Arkin, KAWS’s project assistant, said in court documents that Leong’s goods were priced at between $59 and $3,299, and that the total retail price of all 154 fake KAWS items reached more than $63m. Leong was selling plush dolls, vinyl figurines, ashtrays, skateboards, canvases, posters, sculptures, rugs and neon lights, according to the ruling. Authentic work by KAWS can sell for millions —- his auction record was set in 2019 when Sotheby’s Hong Kong sold The KAWS Album (2005) for $14.8 million (including fees).

According to court documents, one of the companies’ websites stated the goods for sale were ”custom hand-reworked reproductions due to the low prices we are able to provide”. According to the ruling, that was enough evidence to demonstrate Leong “knowingly intended to sell counterfeit KAWS goods”.

KAWS’s team submitted evidence of 154 products created by Leong they claimed infringed on the artist’s copyright, according to the ruling. KAWS said the sale of knockoffs of his work “damages his reputation among the buying public and art aficionados,” and can even “chill the market for his original work because purchasers fear inadvertently acquiring a counterfeit”, according to the ruling. KAWS spends more than $40,000 annually identifying counterfeits and issuing takedown notices, he said.

KAWS filed the lawsuit against Leong in 2021, but noted in court documents that his team first sent over cease-and-desist letters and takedown notices the previous year. Aaron Richard Golub, a lawyer for KAWS, told Artnet News the artist will next seek a judgement against Jonathan Anand, another defendant in the case. Representatives for KAWS declined to comment, and Leong’s lawyer did not immediately respond to The Art Newspaper’s requests for comment.

Copyright infringementKAWSArt marketArt law
Share
Subscribe to The Art Newspaper’s digital newsletter for your daily digest of essential news, views and analysis from the international art world delivered directly to your inbox.
Newsletter sign-up
Information
About
Contact
Cookie policy
Data protection
Privacy policy
Frequently Asked Questions
Subscription T&Cs
Terms and conditions
Advertise
Sister Papers
Sponsorship policy
Follow us
Instagram
Bluesky
LinkedIn
Facebook
TikTok
YouTube
© The Art Newspaper

Related content

Art marketnews
6 January 2022

Sotheby’s faces class-action lawsuit alleging mistreatment and misclassification of workers

Lawyers for the auction house are trying to dismiss the complaint, which they call 'devoid of factual allegations,' but they could be facing a classic Catch-22.

Daniel Cassady
Art marketnews
24 November 2020

'The law has to fall on someone': Seller of allegedly fake Frans Hals must pay Sotheby's $5.4m for cancelled sale, judge insists

London Court of Appeal upholds the auction house's defence in forgery case, rejecting appeal by investment company Fairlight Art Ventures

Vincent Noce
Fakes and forgeriesnews
14 July 2022

Indigenous Canadian artists pressure government to curtail sales of counterfeit First Nations art

Imports of artworks manufactured abroad to replicate Indigenous Canadian styles are not currently regulated

Claire Voon
Robert Indiananews
29 April 2020

Robert Indiana’s LOVE at centre of new $150m fraud claim

American Image Art founder alleges certain works are in the public domain and cannot be copyrighted

Anny Shaw