Digital Editions
Newsletters
Subscribe
Digital Editions
Newsletters
Art market
Museums & heritage
Exhibitions
Books
Podcasts
Columns
Technology
Adventures with Van Gogh
Art market
Museums & heritage
Exhibitions
Books
Podcasts
Columns
Technology
Adventures with Van Gogh
Art theft
news

‘Everything went wrong’: Warhol prints stolen and damaged in bungled Netherlands heist

Two of the vulnerable works were damaged and abandoned, while two others were apparently too large to fit in the getaway car and so were cut out of their frames

Senay Boztas
4 November 2024
Share
A “diamond-dusted” set of the Reigning Queens series, on view at the Paleis Het Loo

Courtesy of Paleis Het Loo. ©/®/TM 2024 The Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. / Licensed by Pictoright Amsterdam 2024

A “diamond-dusted” set of the Reigning Queens series, on view at the Paleis Het Loo

Courtesy of Paleis Het Loo. ©/®/TM 2024 The Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. / Licensed by Pictoright Amsterdam 2024

Two screenprints from Andy Warhol’s 1985 pop art series Reigning Queens have been stolen from a gallery in the Netherlands—and another two damaged—in a botched robbery.

At 3.05am local time in the early hours of Friday morning, residents of a small, cobbled street in the village of Oiserwijk heard a huge explosion, followed by the sound of an alarm coming from MPV Gallery. Criminals who had bombed the front of the building grabbed the four signed and numbered screenprints, which were due to be sold at the PAN Amsterdam art fair in three weeks.

Experts believe it was a far from professional heist: two of the vulnerable prints were damaged and abandoned. The other two, apparently too large to fit in the getaway car, were cut out of their frames and probably irreparably damaged.

“It is appalling,” says Mark Peet Visser, who was storing the portraits—which depict the queens of the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, Denmark and Swaziland (now Eswatini)—in his North Brabant gallery. “It is also unprofessional for a criminal to work like this, with explosives that are far too heavy and a getaway car that is too small for the works.”

He tells The Art Newspaper that very few people knew the works were hidden at the gallery—not in private storage—when the thieves broke in. The damaged works are currently being analysed.

“The [stolen] works cannot be sold any more,” he says. “They are all documented, numbered and can no longer be traded. It’s really not financially interesting to steal art and you can hardly hang them in your living room.”

Arthur Brand, an art detective who last year recovered a stolen Vincent van Gogh painting—the work handed over in an Ikea bag—says the Warhol theft was unlikely to have been a commission. “I think it was some criminals who are not really specialised in art theft, saw an opportunity and thought: let’s first steal them and afterwards see what we can do… and everything went wrong,” he says.

“Some of the pieces were [apparently] already destroyed or damaged by the bomb, then these idiots realised that the car was not big enough so left two of them outside and the other two they removed from their frames on the street. People who have seen the security footage are sure those pieces are also damaged—and with screenprints, if they are damaged or there’s a piece missing, they are worthless.”

Mark Grol, director of PAN Amsterdam, says the prints would have been “one of the highlights” of the art fair at the end of November. Another “diamond-dusted” set of the series—which is so vulnerable that it can only be shown once every 30 years—is currently on display in an exhibition at Paleis Het Loo, Apeldoorn.

Hanna Klarenbeek, the curator of the Paleis Het Loo exhibition, says that these vulnerable prints on paper are especially famous in the Netherlands and the UK, where many people associate images of their former queen with Warhol’s portrait. “We store them face up, lying down, in our storage facilities and we are careful in showing them,” she says. “With this heist, where they left them on the pavement and tore them out of their frames, I assume they are very damaged because I know how vulnerable ours are. You can’t really restore these cracks in the paper. So we are extra alert.”

UPDATE 05/11/24: News reports state that a 23-year-old man has been arrested in connection to the theft. An explosive was reportedly discovered during house searches and defused. It is unclear if this was connected to the robbery or if any art has been recovered at this stage.
Art theftArt crimeAndy WarholCommercial galleries
Share
Subscribe to The Art Newspaper’s digital newsletter for your daily digest of essential news, views and analysis from the international art world delivered directly to your inbox.
Newsletter sign-up
Information
About
Contact
Cookie policy
Data protection
Privacy policy
Frequently Asked Questions
Subscription T&Cs
Terms and conditions
Advertise
Sister Papers
Sponsorship policy
Follow us
Instagram
Bluesky
LinkedIn
Facebook
TikTok
YouTube
© The Art Newspaper

Related content

Museums & Heritagenews
18 March 2025

Thirty five years on from ‘the world’s largest art heist’, how much are the works stolen from the Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum worth?

From $200m to upwards of $1bn, the estimated value of the 13 works stolen in Boston on 18 March 1990 has varied in the decades since

Carlie Porterfield
Art crimenews
28 June 2023

Warhol and Pollock works stolen by American crime ring may not have been destroyed, authorities reveal

Statements by one member of a crime ring that struck 20 different institutions over two decades have restored hope that not all the loot was destroyed

Torey Akers
Art marketarchive
30 September 2005

Court finds Peter Brant really does own Warhol’s Red Elvis

The decision ends a dispute that started in 2000

Georgina Adam