Digital Editions
Newsletters
Subscribe
Digital Editions
Newsletters
Art market
Museums & heritage
Exhibitions
Books
Podcasts
Columns
Art of Luxury
Adventures with Van Gogh
Venice Biennale
Art market
Museums & heritage
Exhibitions
Books
Podcasts
Columns
Art of Luxury
Adventures with Van Gogh
Venice Biennale
Art market
archive

Martin Lawrence Galleries files suit to claim stolen Warhol

Jason Beltrez claims it was a flea market find while Christie's is stuck in the middle

Charmaine Picard
1 March 2008
Share

Martin Lawrence Galleries filed a lawsuit in New York Supreme Court in February against Jason Beltrez and Christie’s auction house for the recovery of an Andy Warhol painting that was stolen from its walls in 1998. The defendant, Mr Beltrez, attempted to consign the painting from Warhol’s Dollar Sign 1981 series to Christie’s in September 2007. A routine search with the Art Loss Register by a Christie’s employee determined that the piece had been reported stolen from the Manhattan gallery nearly a decade before.

Although the Warhol has been confirmed as one of two works stolen from the SoHo gallery on 14 February 1998, Mr Beltrez refuses to return the work, which is valued at $300,000. Mr Beltrez claims that he purchased the painting for $180 at an open-air market in New Jersey, and he plans to defend his ownership in court. Our telephone calls to his lawyer, Vincent Fong of the Law Offices of Vincent S. Fong in New York, have not been returned.

According to court papers, Christie’s is also named as a defendant, but “solely as a stakeholder”, and the painting will remain in its custody until the lawsuit is resolved.

According to Chris Marinello, director and general counsel of the Art Loss Register: “Beltrez doesn’t have a right to keep the work and his claim that the law of the street applies, where finders are keepers is absurd.” He went on to say that the law clearly favours the gallery, since it is impossible to secure good title on stolen art. Mr Marinello also told The Art Newspaper: “We offered Beltrez a finder’s fee as part of the negotiation for recovery but he rejected it in favour of litigation.”

Originally appeared in The Art Newspaper as 'Gallery files suit to claim stolen Warhol'

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

Art marketLawArt theftAndy WarholChristie'sArt Loss Register
Share
Subscribe to The Art Newspaper’s digital newsletter for your daily digest of essential news, views and analysis from the international art world delivered directly to your inbox.
Newsletter subscribe
Information
About
Contact
Cookie policy
Data protection
Privacy policy
Frequently Asked Questions
Subscription T&Cs
Terms and conditions
Advertise
Sister Papers
Sponsorship policy
Follow us
Instagram
Bluesky
LinkedIn
Facebook
TikTok
YouTube
© The Art Newspaper

Related content

Discoveriesarchive
1 December 2006

Stolen art discovered in reclusive collector’s estate

Christie’s and the Stair Galleries both cancelled sales as a result

Martha Lufkin
Newsarchive
30 September 2009

Warhol’s famous athlete portraits stolen from collector Richard Weisman's home

A $1m reward is being offered

Helen Stoilas
Looted artarchive
31 August 2001

Art dealer Adam Williams found guilty after 11 years of litigation

Williams will not appeal French court decision, citing health reasons

Georgina Adam