Digital Editions
Newsletters
Subscribe
Digital Editions
Newsletters
Art market
Museums & heritage
Exhibitions
Books
Podcasts
Columns
Technology
Adventures with Van Gogh
Art market
Museums & heritage
Exhibitions
Books
Podcasts
Columns
Technology
Adventures with Van Gogh
Claude Monet
news

Export licence granted for Monet's $63m painting of London

Owned by a British collector for almost 70 years, the work showing Charing Cross Bridge has gone abroad

Martin Bailey
8 March 2019
Share
Monet's Charing Cross Bridge (1901-04), started in London, completed in Giverny

Monet's Charing Cross Bridge (1901-04), started in London, completed in Giverny

A Monet painting of London’s Charing Cross Bridge has been sold privately for $63m. Although owned by a British collector for nearly 70 years, it has just been granted an export licence and has gone abroad. Monet started the painting on his visit to London in 1901 and reworked it in Giverny, completing it three years later. In 1932, it was bought at Christie’s for £210 by the 9th Duke of Marlborough, who lived in Blenheim Palace in Oxfordshire. Monet painted nearly a hundred London pictures, only a few have ever been owned by British collectors.

The 9th duke sold Charing Cross Bridge just eight days before his death in 1934 and in 1950 it was bought by Alexander Margulies, the owner of a London-based watch and jewellery company. After Margulies’s death in 1992 there was a dispute over his estate, but the High Court ruled that the Monet and other items should be shared among his three children. Monet’s Charing Cross Bridge remained with his descendants and was exhibited in Tate Britain’s Impressionists in London exhibition last year.

The anonymous foreign buyer of the Margulies painting applied for an export licence to take it out of the UK. The Export Reviewing Committee’s expert advised that a licence should be deferred, to enable a UK buyer to match the price, on the grounds of its importance. Their advice was not accepted by the committee, which decided that the Monet did not fall under the so-called Waverley Criteria, and an export licence was granted. The fact that the price was in dollars suggests that the painting has not gone to Europe, and perhaps more likely went to an American or Asian buyer.

Claude MonetUnited Kingdom
Share
Subscribe to The Art Newspaper’s digital newsletter for your daily digest of essential news, views and analysis from the international art world delivered directly to your inbox.
Newsletter sign-up
Information
About
Contact
Cookie policy
Data protection
Privacy policy
Frequently Asked Questions
Subscription T&Cs
Terms and conditions
Advertise
Sister Papers
Sponsorship policy
Follow us
Instagram
Bluesky
LinkedIn
Facebook
TikTok
YouTube
© The Art Newspaper

Related content

Claude Monetnews
20 July 2018

Monet’s lost cat returns home to Giverny

A “purr-fect” ending to the story of the missing pottery object found in the collection of the artist’s secret granddaughter

Martin Bailey
Adventures with Van Goghblog
21 February 2020

A Van Gogh and a Monet: you win one and lose another

The Dutchman’s newly attributed Oslo self-portrait is unveiled in an Amsterdam exhibition, while the Frenchman’s bohemian portrait suffers a downgrading

a blog by Martin Bailey
Claude Monetnews
21 February 2020

Monet for nothing: Musée Marmottan’s ‘self-portrait’ is downgraded

After a long-running debate, the picture, going on show at the Van Gogh Museum in Amsterdam today, has been attributed to Charles Giron

Martin Bailey