Digital Editions
Newsletters
Subscribe
Digital Editions
Newsletters
Art market
Museums & heritage
Exhibitions
Books
Podcasts
Columns
Technology
Adventures with Van Gogh
Art market
Museums & heritage
Exhibitions
Books
Podcasts
Columns
Technology
Adventures with Van Gogh
January 1993
archive

New Czech tax law to encourage private sponsorship for the arts

Tax will now be deductible for donations, but will a 2% relief be enough to make funding art worthwhile?

Joe Cook
1 January 1993
Share
The tower of the Prague Exhibition Center with the Czech flag Photo: Jan Baborák on Unsplash

The tower of the Prague Exhibition Center with the Czech flag Photo: Jan Baborák on Unsplash

An eagerly awaited new tax law that includes a provision for tax relief on personal and corporate donations to cultural, educational, scientific, sporting, religious and humanitarian institutions and events was introduced in the Czech and Slovak Republics on 1 January, the first time that such provisions have been made in Czechoslovakia since 1938.

The country’s hard-pressed cultural and artistic institutions, who have seen their State subsidies drastically lose value in the new market economy, with declining ticket sales and intense competition from Western-style popular entertainment, hope that the new law will encourage private patronage of the arts.

Under its dispositions, an individual may deduct from his tax base the value of donations granted to, for example, a gallery, museum, opera house or theatre. The minimum donation eligible for tax relief is 2,000 Crowns (£50; $80), approximately one week’s average salary in Czechoslovakia. A maximum of two per cent relief is allowed against his or her entire taxable income. For companies, the minimum tax deductable donation is 2,000 Crowns in any tax period, the maximum being ten per cent of total taxable income.

Mr Jan Sekera, director of Prague’s Stredoceska Galerie, one of the city’s leading contemporary galleries, said of the new tax law, “I’m afraid that there will be no great movement as the relief is limited to only two per cent. Our only hope is sponsorship but even here I feel that most corporations would prefer investment. Culture will come last on the list of charitable sponsorship. I am not optimistic”. Of the situation regarding museums, Mr Sekera explained, “Since 1989 state support has been nominally more or less the same after allowing for inflation. However, from next year museums will have to pay tax and national insurance contributions on behalf of their staff, which was not applied previously. This means that, whereas previously about 50% of a museum’s budget would go on staff costs, next year almost the entire budget—over 90%—will go on wages and staff costs. It is a critical situation”.

January 1993EconomicsLawFundingTaxPragueSponsorshipFunding matters
Share
Subscribe to The Art Newspaper’s digital newsletter for your daily digest of essential news, views and analysis from the international art world delivered directly to your inbox.
Newsletter sign-up
Information
About
Contact
Cookie policy
Data protection
Privacy policy
Frequently Asked Questions
Subscription T&Cs
Terms and conditions
Advertise
Sister Papers
Sponsorship policy
Follow us
Instagram
Bluesky
LinkedIn
Facebook
TikTok
YouTube
© The Art Newspaper

Related content

Economicsarchive
1 January 1991

Spain debates new legislation that attempts to induce sponsorship of the arts with tax cuts

If the law is passed, sponsors will be granted legal provisions so they might better circumvent obstacles that complicate art funding

The Art Newspaper
Sponsorshiparchive
1 November 1994

Spanish to bring in laws that smooth the path for art sponsorship

Tax mandates pertaining to the acquisition of art will be eased for both donors and foundations

The Art Newspaper