Digital Editions
Newsletters
Subscribe
Digital Editions
Newsletters
Art market
Museums & heritage
Exhibitions
Books
Podcasts
Columns
Technology
Adventures with Van Gogh
Art market
Museums & heritage
Exhibitions
Books
Podcasts
Columns
Technology
Adventures with Van Gogh
Law
archive

Former Met lawyer to advise private collectors and museums

Reflecting the continuous rise in the value of art and importance of provenance

The Art Newspaper
30 April 2001
Share

After 23 years at the Metropolitan Museum of Art, Ashton Hawkins, 64, will become a consultant to the Met and begin an affiliation with the law firm, Gersten, Savage and Kaplowitz. He plans to advise individuals on making gifts to museums. A longtime mondain as well as a respected attorney, Mr Hawkins probably knows more of these individuals than any other member of the New York bar. He has also signed on to represent the Neue Galerie, a new museum devoted to German and Austrian art of this century funded by the collector Ronald Lauder, who has had his own battles with works of doubtful provenance. Mr Hawkins will also represent collectors. “People are more aware of warranties and of provenances. People are more aware of themselves in the event of prior histories that they didn’t know about,” he says. Mr Hawkins says he does not expect to represent clients making claims against museums. Indeed, Mr Hawkins is expected to be a voice in support of museum interests and against new efforts to regulate museums or the art market, especially in the field of export control.“Museums have come into the world in a way that they hadn’t when I first visited the Met,” says Mr Hawkins, who expects advising museums to be part of his practice. “I’m eager to do it, because I have accumulated a lot of experience in this area, and I think it’s helpful to pass it along, as I have done for years.” One advantage, Mr Hawkins says, is that “there are not so many lawyers in private practice in New York, in fact there are very few, in that field. The big firms don't really care about this stuff because they can’t make a lot of money off of it. On the other hand, as the value of art continues to rise, the controversies can sometimes be very fierce. Think of the legal fees for the Museum of Modern Art in the Schiele case: more than a million dollars.”

LawCollectorsMuseums & HeritageProvenanceMuseum gifts
Share
Subscribe to The Art Newspaper’s digital newsletter for your daily digest of essential news, views and analysis from the international art world delivered directly to your inbox.
Newsletter sign-up
Information
About
Contact
Cookie policy
Data protection
Privacy policy
Frequently Asked Questions
Subscription T&Cs
Terms and conditions
Advertise
Sister Papers
Sponsorship policy
Follow us
Instagram
Bluesky
LinkedIn
Facebook
TikTok
YouTube
© The Art Newspaper

Related content

June 2005archive
1 June 2005

'The art trade is the last major unregulated market'

Is it time for reform? Murky dealings came to light in 2005 as more collectors began to enter the scene—and brought their cases to court

Marc Spiegler
Museums & Heritagearchive
31 May 2008

Director of German contemporary art museum explores his “Carte Blanche” approach to private collectors

“What is often described as the ‘undue’ influence of collectors and dealers is less of a threat than the noticeable tendency for these parties to lose interest in public institutions”

Barbara Steiner
Museums & Heritagearchive
31 May 2008

German museum under fire for ceding control of exhibitions to dealers and collectors

Gallery director says private sector must be courted, not alienated

Jane Morris
September 2008archive
1 September 2008

Denver Art Museum art-share deal under investigation for breaching deaccessioning guidelines

Billionaire collector was given a half share in a Charles Deas painting in exchange for funding a Thomas Eakins acquisition

Jason Edward Kaufman