Digital Editions
Newsletters
Subscribe
Digital Editions
Newsletters
Art market
Museums & heritage
Exhibitions
Books
Podcasts
Columns
Technology
Adventures with Van Gogh
Art market
Museums & heritage
Exhibitions
Books
Podcasts
Columns
Technology
Adventures with Van Gogh
Copyright
news

Richard Prince is sued yet again for unauthorised appropriation of photographs

Eric McNatt files lawsuit over artist’s reproduction of a portrait of rock musician Kim Gordon

Laura Gilbert
21 November 2016
Share

The artist Richard Prince has been sued for a fifth time for his unauthorised use of a celebrity photographer’s work. Eric McNatt filed the latest copyright infringement lawsuit on 16 November in Manhattan’s federal court over a portrait he took in 2014 of the musician Kim Gordon, from the alternative rock band Sonic Youth, to accompany an interview published by Paper magazine. The gallery Blum & Poe and Ocula, which sells art online, are also named as defendants in the case.

According to McNatt’s complaint, the day after Paper published his photograph with the interview, Prince posted the portrait on Instagram, modified only by minor cropping at the top and bottom and three captions written by Prince. The artist then blew up the Instagram portrait as an inkjet print, which was exhibited by Blum & Poe at its Tokyo gallery in 2015, and offered for sale on Oculus’s website, according to the court papers. McNatt also says that Prince and the gallery included it in a book of Prince’s Instagram-based portraits. McNatt’s clients include the likes of Oprah Winfrey and Courtney Love, and McNatt claims that Prince’s unauthorised use of his work usurps the market for his portraits.

Prince’s attorney Josh Schiller says that the complaint “fundamentally misunderstands fair use”, a principle his client is fighting for to the benefit of “many, many artists”.

In 2008, Patrick Cariou sued Prince for using his Rastafarian portraits. The Second Circuit Court of Appeals in 2013 ruled that 25 of Prince’s works were fair use; the parties settled Cariou’s claims on the remaining five works. McNatt’s complaint quotes an interview Prince gave Russh magazine, where he said Cariou’s lawsuit helped sell the paintings that used his work. “If this guy had let it alone, well it was a very unsuccessful body of work, and it would have gone away.”

Prince has filed a motion to dismiss a suit brought by another photographer, Donald Graham, with the decision pending in Manhattan federal court. Two other suits brought against Prince in California, by Ashley Salazar and Dennis Morris, were dismissed last August on the understanding they would be refiled in New York.

CopyrightArt law
Share
Subscribe to The Art Newspaper’s digital newsletter for your daily digest of essential news, views and analysis from the international art world delivered directly to your inbox.
Newsletter sign-up
Information
About
Contact
Cookie policy
Data protection
Privacy policy
Frequently Asked Questions
Subscription T&Cs
Terms and conditions
Advertise
Sister Papers
Sponsorship policy
Follow us
Instagram
Bluesky
LinkedIn
Facebook
TikTok
YouTube
© The Art Newspaper

Related content

Art lawnews
15 May 2023

Judge refuses to toss two copyright infringement lawsuits against Richard Prince

New York judge says the appropriation artist's New Portraits series does not achieve the level of transformation necessary to shield him from litigation

Torey Akers
Lawsuitsnews
19 March 2024

Warhol Foundation to pay photographer $21,000 as dispute over Prince portraits ends

The case had gone all the way to the US Supreme Court, which last spring ruled in favour of the photographer Lynn Goldsmith

Martha Lufkin
News
7 June 2016

Third copyright lawsuit filed against Richard Prince for appropriating Sid Vicious photo

The artist is accused of using a London photographer’s image of the Sex Pistol’s bassist in an Instagram work

Laura Gilbert