ePaper
Subscribe
Newsletters
Search
Profile
Visitor Figures
Art market
Museums & heritage
Exhibitions
Books
Podcasts
Columns
Vermeer
Adventures with Van Gogh
Russia-Ukraine war
Subscribe
ePaper
Newsletters
Visitor Figures
Art market
Museums & heritage
Exhibitions
Books
Podcasts
Columns
Vermeer
Adventures with Van Gogh
Russia-Ukraine war
Philip Guston
news

'They fear controversy': open letter condemning museums for delaying Guston show signed by 100 artists and intellectuals

“The people who run our great institutions do not want trouble,” say signatories

Gareth Harris
1 October 2020
Share
A detail of Philip Guston’s Courtroom (1970) Photo: Flickr

A detail of Philip Guston’s Courtroom (1970) Photo: Flickr

More than 100 artists, writers and scholars have signed an open letter demanding that the exhibition Philip Guston Now be reinstated by four museums who recently announced plans to delay the show until 2024.

The letter, issued by the non-profit Brooklyn Rail organisation, has been signed by artists Julie Mehretu, Peter Doig and Nicole Eisenman, along with curators Catherine de Zegher and Kathy Halbreich. “The people who run our great institutions do not want trouble. They fear controversy. They lack faith in the intelligence of their audience,” the letter says.

The signatories say they were “shocked and disappointed to read the news that the National Gallery of Art, Washington, DC.; the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston; the Museum of Fine Arts, Houston; and Tate Modern, London, had postponed by four years their planned exhibition Philip Guston Now, which had already been delayed until 2021 by the Covid-19 lockdown”.

Though it was not referred to explicitly in the statement issued by the museums on 21 September, it seems that Guston’s paintings and drawings featuring hooded figures evoking the Ku Klux Klan were the issue. The museums said that they are postponing the exhibition “until a time we think that the powerful message of social and racial justice that is at the centre of Philip Guston’s work can be more clearly interpreted”. The institutions say they plan to “reframe their programming… and bring in additional perspectives and voices to shape how we present Guston’s work to our public”.

The signatories add that staff across the four museums should “prepare themselves to engage with a public that might well be curious about why a painter—ever self-critical and a standard-bearer for freedom—was compelled to use such imagery. That does not permit the museums to fall back on the old discredited stance: ‘We are the experts. Our job is to show you what’s of value in art and your part is to appreciate it.’ It means that museums must engage in a reckoning with history, including their own histories of prejudice.”

Philip GustonControversiesExhibitions
Share
Subscribe to The Art Newspaper’s digital newsletter for your daily digest of essential news, views and analysis from the international art world delivered directly to your inbox.
Newsletter sign-up
Information
About
Contact
Cookie policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions
Advertise
Sister Papers
Sponsorship policy
Follow us
Facebook
Instagram
Twitter
YouTube
LinkedIn
© The Art Newspaper