Digital Editions
Newsletters
Subscribe
Digital Editions
Newsletters
Art market
Museums & heritage
Exhibitions
Books
Podcasts
Columns
Technology
Adventures with Van Gogh
Art market
Museums & heritage
Exhibitions
Books
Podcasts
Columns
Technology
Adventures with Van Gogh
Art market
news

New York gallery faces multi-million-dollar lawsuit over a Rothko’s mystery provenance

The lawsuit claims the Manhattan gallery Edward Tyler Nahem Fine Art is refusing to divulge the seller of 'Untitled (Red, Yellow, Blue, Black and White)' (1950), which has left the provenance incomplete and the painting unsellable

Daniel Cassady
2 February 2022
Share
Mark Rothko Wikipedia Commons

Mark Rothko Wikipedia Commons

UPDATE 23 February: Earlier this month, on 10 February, the lawsuit against Edward Tyler Nahem was dropped. According to a statement from both Nahem & Jacques de la Béraudière, the lawsuit was filed a as the "result of a misunderstanding about the terms of the 2006 sale of Mark Rothko’s Untitled (Red, Yellow, Blue, Black and White) from 1950 (catalogue raisonné number 434). Mr. Nahem had no obligation to divulge confidential client information, nor has he hindered the future marketing or sale of this painting in any way. Mr. de la Béraudière and Mr. Nahem have mutually agreed to move forward with their professional relationship in an amicable manner."

In 2006, the Manhattan gallery Edward Tyler Nahem Fine Art (ETN) sold a painting by Abstract Expressionism stalwart Mark Rothko for $5.4m. Now, the Brussels-based Galerie Jacques de la Béraudiere (GJB) is trying to sell the same painting, but is being stopped at every turn because ETN refuses to reveal who owned the painting when they sold it 16 years ago, which makes the provenance incomplete.

According to the the Belgian gallery’s lawsuit, filed in New York’s southern district court by the Manhattan lawyer David J. Hoffman, “forgery scandals have undermined confidence in formerly trusted experts and gallerists” and it is well known that the “art market [is] a potential haven for money laundering”. As a result, practices that were “tolerated just a few years ago are no longer viable”.

The art world is moving toward transparency, albeit at a glacial pace. Recent anti-money laundering regulations changing the landscape of the art market in the US, the UK and Europe have pushed for increased clarity in the often-veiled and indecipherable art market.

According to the complaint, GJB has tried to sell the work at high-profile auction houses, including Christie’s and Sotheby’s, but has been denied at every turn because the provenance lists one owner, who sold the work through Edward Tyler Nahem Fine Art in 2006, as “Private collection, California”.

While ETN claims to be adhering a confidentiality agreement that prevents the gallery from revealing the previous owner, legal precedent could weigh against them. In 2014 a judge ruled against the collector Marguerite Hoffman, who in 2007 sold a Rothko that had been on view at the Dallas Museum of Art, and tried to keep her name confidential when the buyers put the work up for sale at Sotheby’s a few years later.

A source familiar with this new Rothko case told The Art Newspaper that attempts have been made to defuse the situation while keeping the California collector’s name secret. If ETN would let a potential buyer or auction house know the California collector’s identity, that identity could still be kept from the public. But ETN has so far held its ground.

Anonymous owners have not always hampered the sale of a blue-chip work of art, especially when it comes to Rothko. In 2020 Christie’s moved an untitled piece by the artist from 1967, with multiple unnamed owners listed in its provenance, for $31.2m. On the other hand, provenance is one of the best ways to tell whether a work is legitimate, as evidenced by the Knoedler scandal—which exposed a number of “Rothko” works as fakes.

A lawyer for Edward Tyler Nahem Fine Art did not respond to request for comment about this case.

Art marketMark RothkoArt lawProvenance
Share
Subscribe to The Art Newspaper’s digital newsletter for your daily digest of essential news, views and analysis from the international art world delivered directly to your inbox.
Newsletter sign-up
Information
About
Contact
Cookie policy
Data protection
Privacy policy
Frequently Asked Questions
Subscription T&Cs
Terms and conditions
Advertise
Sister Papers
Sponsorship policy
Follow us
Instagram
Bluesky
LinkedIn
Facebook
TikTok
YouTube
© The Art Newspaper

Related content

Economicsarchive
30 April 2011

Lawyers, funds and money: How litigious is the art world?

And is litigation in the art world on the rise?

Georgina Adam
Provenancenews
28 March 2022

Rothko lawsuit lays bare the privacy versus provenance conflict

A recent case, relating to the sale of work by the Abstract Expressionist, centred on the tension between client confidentiality and transparency; the solution is far from simple

Daniel Cassady
Art marketnews
23 December 2015

2015's biggest art market developments and what they mean

From the contraction of the Chinese economy to the death of zombie formalism

Georgina Adam
Art marketnews
6 December 2016

Sotheby’s buys Orion Analytical lab in fight against art fraud

As forgery cases pile up, auction house is also setting up a scientific research department

Ermanno Rivetti