Digital Editions
Newsletters
Subscribe
Digital Editions
Newsletters
Art market
Museums & heritage
Exhibitions
Books
Podcasts
Columns
Technology
Adventures with Van Gogh
Art market
Museums & heritage
Exhibitions
Books
Podcasts
Columns
Technology
Adventures with Van Gogh
Diary of an art historian
comment

The British Museum's NFT project has sent its carbon footprint soaring

Since the London museum began selling digital versions of works from its collection last September, it has emitted enough carbon to power an average US home for at least 57 years

Bendor Grosvenor
5 April 2022
Share
Digital versions of works by Joseph Mallord William Turner, such as The Colosseum, Rome (1920), are being sold as NFTs by the British Museum. © 2022, The Trustees of the British Museum

Digital versions of works by Joseph Mallord William Turner, such as The Colosseum, Rome (1920), are being sold as NFTs by the British Museum. © 2022, The Trustees of the British Museum

I’ve been looking into the carbon cost of the British Museum’s sales of non-fungible tokens. It’s a lot. We can’t be precise about how much planetary damage the British Museum (BM) is doing, but we can get a good idea from publicly available data. Since the project began last September, the BM’s exclusive NFT partner, LaCollection, has listed 2,105 NFTs on the OpenSea platform. Minting and selling NFTs is carbon-intensive because the blockchain on which they’re traded requires high energy use. The Digiconomist website estimates that each transaction uses enough electricity to power the average US home for around nine days, producing 150kg of CO2. So just for the BM’s NFTs already offered for sale, we get a starting carbon cost of 315 tonnes of CO2—enough to power that US home for 57 years.

Each NFT sale creates another transaction and thus further emissions. The widely used carbon-offsetting website Aerial estimates the total emissions associated with the BM’s NFTs so far is 819 tonnes of CO2. Last year, the British Museum calculated its emissions over the whole museum to be 5,861 tonnes. In only six months of selling jpegs, the BM has thus significantly increased its annual emissions. LaCollection says it will plant one tree for each NFT it makes. One tree will absorb about one tonne of CO2 over the course of 100 years. The BM said recently that it views NFTs as “a multi-year play”, so one tree per NFT is not nearly enough.

The BM has a sustainable development policy. It hasn’t been updated since 2007 and is one page long. It says: “The British Museum is committed to sustainable development throughout all the aspects of its operation”, and pledges to make “efficient and effective use of energy; through the elimination or reduction of any detrimental impact that its activities might have on the environment”. Did anyone involved in the BM’s NFT project read this?

I suppose museums’ need for cash now trumps everything. Chanel has formed a partnership with the National Portrait Gallery, funding the acquisition of five much needed female self-portraits. Yet how much influence should museums give their new funders? An article in Vogue says: “Chanel is now involved in reorganising the gallery’s permanent collection,” and has even “appointed its own curator Dr Flavia Frigeri”. I assumed this was just public relations gloss, yet the NPG confirmed to me that Chanel is indeed involved in the recruitment process. I’ve no doubt the NPG can make the partnership work for it, but I hope other sponsors don’t now demand the same involvement at other museums.

But compared with the war in Ukraine, and the prospect of a wider war, what does it matter? I am glued to the news. The fight against Vladimir Putin puts the privileged indulgence of studying art history into perspective. In a former life, I did a PhD on the 1877-78 Russo-Turkish war. It was just one of many Russia has fought over its southwestern borders, but it’s also the only one which didn’t become a wider European conflict. Most of the time Europe is eventually drawn in, as gradually seems to be the case now, so I am more than usually anxious. Last week I found myself looking on Amazon for Geiger counters. It seems fantastical, voyeuristic even, that we can watch it all unfolding on our phones. I wonder if enough of us realise how many of our freedoms depend on the bravery of a people in a faraway country, of whom, until recently, we knew almost nothing? Slava Ukraini.

Diary of an art historianRussia-Ukraine warNFTBritish Museum
Share
Subscribe to The Art Newspaper’s digital newsletter for your daily digest of essential news, views and analysis from the international art world delivered directly to your inbox.
Newsletter sign-up
Information
About
Contact
Cookie policy
Data protection
Privacy policy
Frequently Asked Questions
Subscription T&Cs
Terms and conditions
Advertise
Sister Papers
Sponsorship policy
Follow us
Instagram
Bluesky
LinkedIn
Facebook
TikTok
YouTube
© The Art Newspaper

Related content

NFTinterview
7 April 2023

The dawn of blockchain? CryptoPunks evangelist Noah Davis on why the Centre Pompidou NFT show is a game-changer

Davis oversaw $69m Beeple NFT sale at Christie’s in 2021

Gareth Harris
Diary of an art historiancomment
22 June 2022

British Museum presses on minting NFTs despite crypto crash—when will UK museums stop seeing artworks as assets?

This Diary's predictions about NFTs, Brexit and Boris Johnson have all come true. But Britain removing image restrictions on art would be the ultimate victory

Bendor Grosvenor
Diary of an art historianblog
9 February 2022

The British Museum demeans itself by selling its works as NFTs—and will probably live to regret it

In giving cultural validity to meaningless reproductions of Turner and Hokusai pieces, The British Museum blurs the lines between real and fake at its peril

Bendor Grosvenor
Art marketnews
30 March 2021

NFT breakthrough: Ethereum co-founder Joe Lubin creates 99% energy efficient blockchain—and Damien Hirst is its first artist

Hirst launches the Palm platform with a drop of 10,000 works on paper linked to NFTs that “explore the boundaries of art and currency”

Anny Shaw