Digital Editions
Newsletters
Subscribe
Digital Editions
Newsletters
Art market
Museums & heritage
Exhibitions
Books
Podcasts
Columns
Technology
Adventures with Van Gogh
Art market
Museums & heritage
Exhibitions
Books
Podcasts
Columns
Technology
Adventures with Van Gogh
Museums & Heritage
news

San Francisco’s Asian Art Museum sues architect and construction company behind new $38m pavilion

The museum says that Why Architects and Swinerton Builders “failed to meet even the minimum museum-quality standards”

Elena Goukassian
27 September 2023
Share
Why Architects' rendering of the Asian Art Museum's pavilion project Courtesy the Asian Art Museum of San Francisco

Why Architects' rendering of the Asian Art Museum's pavilion project Courtesy the Asian Art Museum of San Francisco

San Francisco’s Asian Art Museum is suing Why Architects and Swinerton Builders over a $38m museum addition designed by the firm and built by the construction company. The museum announced the lawsuit in a press release on 25 September, saying that the legal action follows a claim filed against the museum in 2021 by Swinerton. The “cross-complaint is for damages due to breach of contract as well as indemnity and defence against claims brought by Swinerton”, the press release states, noting that the museum “takes this action only after extensive efforts to resolve the matter amicably, including through mediation”.

The suit stems from the design and construction of the Asian Art Museum's new pavilion, “a key component of a multi-year programme to transform the museum’s visitor experience and extend the life of its century-old, landmark Civic Center home”.

In 2016, the museum hired Why and Swinerton for the project, which was completed in 2020. However, the museum claims, “it was delivered late, and as originally constructed, it failed to meet even the minimum museum-quality standards: it leaked in multiple locations, its interior environment was of inadequate quality and its rooftop terrace was unusable”. As a result, the museum had to pay the “significant cost” of identifying and repairing these issues.

“The fundamental question to be resolved in the action is who must pay for those costly repairs and interventions,” the museum's statement continues. “Swinerton claims that it is not responsible, and points to what it contends were incomplete and inadequate plans prepared by Why. Why denies those claims, and asserts that Swinerton failed to follow Why's designs and basic, standard construction practices.”

With the museum stuck in the middle, a lawsuit appeared to be its best course of action in order to recoup repair costs. The same day that the museum issued this press release, it also announced the official opening of its new East West Bank Art Terrace, which Why Architects (and, presumably, Swinerton) had worked on.

Artist interview

Takashi Murakami: the pop artist on cartoons, capitalism and what he learnt from Star Wars

José da Silva

This is far from the first time a cultural institution has sued the architects and builders of its own project years after completion. Earlier in 2023, the City of New York sued the architects of a new public library in Queens (completed in 2019) for not adhering to accessibility standards in its design. Meanwhile, in Whitehorse, Canada, the MacBride Museum sued the architecture firm and building contractor of its expansion project (completed in 2018) over a leak in the new roof that put its artefacts at risk.

Museums & HeritageSan Francisco Asian Art MuseumSan FranciscoLawsuitsArt lawBuilding projects
Share
Subscribe to The Art Newspaper’s digital newsletter for your daily digest of essential news, views and analysis from the international art world delivered directly to your inbox.
Newsletter sign-up
Information
About
Contact
Cookie policy
Data protection
Privacy policy
Frequently Asked Questions
Subscription T&Cs
Terms and conditions
Advertise
Sister Papers
Sponsorship policy
Follow us
Instagram
Bluesky
LinkedIn
Facebook
TikTok
YouTube
© The Art Newspaper

Related content

Art lawnews
25 April 2025

Judge orders the Art Institute of Chicago to restitute Nazi-looted Schiele drawing

The latest development in the ongoing dispute over a 1916 portrait believed to have been stolen from Fritz Grünbaum by the Nazis

Elena Goukassian
Museums & Heritagenews
11 December 2018

Staff at State Russian Museum take legal action to halt renovation

Senior employees claim the $17m project threatens the Mikhailovsky Palace building and its collections

Sophia Kishkovsky
Artistsnews
8 December 2020

Artist sues Los Angeles and the Chinese American Museum for junking his work

Lawsuit demands that court issue an injunction to prevent future dismantling of works of art without artists’ supervision

Nancy Kenney