Digital Editions
Newsletters
Subscribe
Digital Editions
Newsletters
Art market
Museums & heritage
Exhibitions
Books
Podcasts
Columns
Technology
Adventures with Van Gogh
Art market
Museums & heritage
Exhibitions
Books
Podcasts
Columns
Technology
Adventures with Van Gogh
Artificial intelligence
analysis

The difference between ‘open’ AI and ‘closed’ AI—and what it means

Louis Jebb
22 May 2024
Share

One of the headline elements of Stanford’s Artificial Intelligence Index Report is how, among “frontier”—game-changing—new AI models (programmes trained on vast amounts of text, audio and image data to generate an output, or “answer”),“closed” AI models are outperforming “open” AI models at the “space race” level of the AI industry. This matters to the art world as artists and cultural institutions have traditionally thrived in the “open-source” areas of internet and app development.

Closed AI

A “closed” AI model is one where developers do not release the “weights” —the adjustable rate at which different parts of an AI network communicate with others—of a model, so that it cannot be freely and openly modified. In a closed version, developers either reveal nothing at all, or allow access only through a controlled interface (API). Examples of the latter include the hugely popular Chat GPT family (from OpenAI) or Claude, an “AI assistant” designed for use in businesses built by Anthropic (launched by former OpenAI staff) .

Open AI

An “open” AI model, such as theLlama 3 large language model (LLM) from Meta (owners of Instagram and Facebook) is offered under the “open-source” ethos of the early internet and development, to encourage experimentation by developers, researchers and businesses. Llama, Meta says,is intended “as a bedrock for innovation in the global community”. Google, the tech giant whose Gemini is a closed model, released an open model, Gemma, in February. It is designed to work on a high-powered laptop or Google Cloud.In May it announced the launch of Gemma 2,a much larger version with 27 billion parameters (or basic ingredients),compared with the two or seven billion parameters in the first release. Google invites researchers to apply for Google Cloud credits of up to a collective $500,000 to work on their projects. The artist Refik Anadol is due to release his open model, Dataland, in 2025.

Who offers what?

Of the tech giants, Microsoft and OpenAI favour closed models, Meta open, while Google offers both.

Artificial intelligenceTechnologyGoogleMeta
Share
Subscribe to The Art Newspaper’s digital newsletter for your daily digest of essential news, views and analysis from the international art world delivered directly to your inbox.
Newsletter sign-up
Information
About
Contact
Cookie policy
Data protection
Privacy policy
Frequently Asked Questions
Subscription T&Cs
Terms and conditions
Advertise
Sister Papers
Sponsorship policy
Follow us
Instagram
Bluesky
LinkedIn
Facebook
TikTok
YouTube
© The Art Newspaper

Related content

Technologyanalysis
2 February 2024

Face time: how the art world is preparing to work with the Apple Vision Pro

The mixed reality headset offers astonishing visual quality. But, as it goes on sale at $3,500 a go, how will it enhance curators' dreams of giving global access to high-fidelity experiences of gallery and museum shows?

Louis Jebb
Technologyanalysis
30 June 2023

Is AI generating an ‘averaged’, one-sided, view of art history?

Artists are getting creative to counter visual language being skewed by image-generating apps that average out scraped stock photos and social media files into “mean images”

Clara Che Wei Peh
Artificial intelligencenews
30 May 2024

The art world’s AI dilemma: how can artists and museums thrive when big tech controls the monetising of artificial intelligence?

The presence of AI in every aspect of life has been a fact for the past 20 months. With the publication of the Stanford AI Index, two areas have come into focus. For museums, how to work with industry giants, without having their offering "distanced" by the summarising power of AI. For artists, how to thrive where sources of production are being monetised in Silicon Valley

Chris Michaels