Digital Editions
Newsletters
Subscribe
Digital Editions
Newsletters
Art market
Museums & heritage
Exhibitions
Books
Podcasts
Columns
Art of Luxury
Adventures with Van Gogh
Venice Biennale
Art market
Museums & heritage
Exhibitions
Books
Podcasts
Columns
Art of Luxury
Adventures with Van Gogh
Venice Biennale
Auctions
news

Sotheby’s catalogue mistakenly includes work forged by Wolfgang Beltracchi

Auction house removes image from online version after German journalist spots error

By Catherine Hickley
24 February 2017
Share

The catalogue for the 2 March Sotheby’s Impressionist and Modern Art Day Sale in London mistakenly identifies a forgery by Wolfgang Beltracchi called Souvenir d’Anvers as a genuine collaboration by the Fauvist artist Achille-Émile Othon Friesz and Georges Braque.

The work—which is not in the auction—is illustrated in the catalogue to support the sale of a Friesz painting called La Ciotat, whose authenticity is not in doubt and which carries an estimate of £500,000 to £700,000. The forgery was spotted by the German journalist Stefan Koldehoff, who wrote an article for the weekly newspaper Die Zeit.

A text alongside the illustration of Souvenir d’Anvers says “Friesz and Braque sat side by side, painting the same views and each challenging the other to paint with the most radical colours and the least commitment to literal representation possible.” The painting shows nine small harbour scenes described in the Sotheby’s catalogue as views of Antwerp.

“In what was a genuine mistake, Souvenir d’Anvers, formerly attributed to Braque and Friesz, was erroneously illustrated as one of the comparative images in our catalogue,” says a spokeswoman for Sotheby’s. “The image has now been removed from our website.”

Koldehoff co-authored a 2012 book with his colleague Tobias Timm about Beltracchi, in which they describe the Friesz/Braque forgery. They said that on the back of the painting there was a bad imitation of a label from the Galerie Alfred Flechtheim and another from the Galerie Schames, which no longer existed in 1906—the year the painting was supposed to have been produced. The work also contains a spelling mistake: In the centre are the words “Souvenir de Anvers” instead of the correct French “Souvenir d’Anvers.” The painting was consigned to the Paris-based Galerie Aittouarès by Beltracchi’s associate Otto Schulte-Kellinghaus, according to the book.

The German state prosecutor estimated that Beltracchi and his accomplices reaped about €16m from his forgeries, which were sold in the US, Japan, the UK and France as well as Germany. His trial focussed on just 14 forged works but Beltracchi himself estimates he created around 300, most of which are still in circulation. He was released from prison in 2015.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

Auctions
Share
Subscribe to The Art Newspaper’s digital newsletter for your daily digest of essential news, views and analysis from the international art world delivered directly to your inbox.
Newsletter subscribe
Information
About
Contact
Cookie policy
Data protection
Privacy policy
Frequently Asked Questions
Subscription T&Cs
Terms and conditions
Advertise
Sister Papers
Sponsorship policy
Follow us
Instagram
Bluesky
LinkedIn
Facebook
TikTok
YouTube
© The Art Newspaper

Related content

Fakes & copiesarchive
31 March 2012

Beltracchi admits to faking the work of an estimated 50 artists in German interview

In 2011, he was given six years jail time for what was then understood to be a much smaller number of reproductions

Julia Michalska
Forgeriesarchive
1 December 2012

How the detection of titanium white gave away Beltracchi

The pigment proved Beltracchi's version was inauthentic, since it was not in use at the time that the original was painted

Julia Michalska
Acquisitionsnews
17 September 2024

Bavaria acquires Picasso’s Woman with a Violin from a private collection

Six sponsors cooperated to buy “a masterpiece of Cubism of priceless art historical value” for the Pinakothek der Moderne in Munich

Catherine Hickley