Digital Editions
Newsletters
Subscribe
Digital Editions
Newsletters
Art market
Museums & heritage
Exhibitions
Books
Podcasts
Columns
Technology
Adventures with Van Gogh
Art market
Museums & heritage
Exhibitions
Books
Podcasts
Columns
Technology
Adventures with Van Gogh
Art market
news

EU copyright crackdown is intended to protect artists, but might it damage their market instead?

New laws to stop copyrighted material from being uploaded to social media without permission could pose problems for those using sites like Instagram to sell art

Anny Shaw
25 April 2019
Share
New EU rules stipulate that social media sites must take active measures to prevent copyrighted material—such as images of works of art—from being uploaded without permission Pixabay

New EU rules stipulate that social media sites must take active measures to prevent copyrighted material—such as images of works of art—from being uploaded without permission Pixabay

The first major update to European copyright rules in nearly two decades could pose problems for dealers and other users who upload images of works of art to social media sites such as Instagram.

Despite intense lobbying led by Google and internet freedom activists, who say the new rules curtail freedom of expression online, sweeping reforms were approved by a majority of EU member states on 15 April. The new rules stipulate that websites that host user-generated content must take active measures to prevent copyrighted material from being uploaded without permission–or risk being held liable for copyright infringement.

Instagram has fast become a favourite tool of the art world, with multi-million-pound works now being sold via the social media site. So will the new rules have a chilling effect on the market by adding red tape, or are they likely to offer artists greater protection?

Karen Sanig, the head of art law at the London firm Mishcon de Reya, says the effects of the new law in relation to online sales will depend on how it is implemented, and whether there will be any exemptions carved out akin to those that allow reproductions in auction catalogues. Brexit could further complicate matters.

“It will certainly give pause for thought for those currently freely uploading and those reproducing copyright works,” she says.

Sanig believes the new move could be “part of the beginning of regulation of the art market but under the guise of being for the benefit of artists”. She adds: “Certainly, if it stifles sales it will not benefit artists, but time will tell. It may mean closer liaison between artists and their representatives to ensure that necessary permissions are obtained before images are used online, which for an artist trying to monitor sales ought to be a positive outcome.”

Indeed, artists and publishers pushed for the changes to put an end to online infringements. But, according to a statement from Google, the directive could lead to “legal uncertainty and will hurt Europe’s creative and digital economies”.

Art marketLawArtistsCopyright
Share
Subscribe to The Art Newspaper’s digital newsletter for your daily digest of essential news, views and analysis from the international art world delivered directly to your inbox.
Newsletter sign-up
Information
About
Contact
Cookie policy
Data protection
Privacy policy
Frequently Asked Questions
Subscription T&Cs
Terms and conditions
Advertise
Sister Papers
Sponsorship policy
Follow us
Instagram
Bluesky
LinkedIn
Facebook
TikTok
YouTube
© The Art Newspaper

Related content

Art marketnews
16 February 2018

Art businesses ill-prepared for new EU data protection law

Data privacy is getting a long-overdue overhaul with GDPR, but is the art market ready?

Ivan Macquisten
Featuresarchive
31 March 1998

The tensions in copyright law between the rights of artist, public and trade

We asked a number of lawyers to comment on the situation with regard to catalogues in their own jurisdictions, and found that the scope of protection varies widely

The Art Newspaper
Technologycomment
15 December 2023

Why artists fear online safety laws will chill freedom of expression

Free expression groups and creatives believe the price of “safety” on the internet may be the exclusion of marginalised artists and groups, and an end to online privacy for all

Emma Shapiro