Digital Editions
Newsletters
Subscribe
Digital Editions
Newsletters
Art market
Museums & heritage
Exhibitions
Books
Podcasts
Columns
Technology
Adventures with Van Gogh
Art market
Museums & heritage
Exhibitions
Books
Podcasts
Columns
Technology
Adventures with Van Gogh
Jean-Michel Basquiat
archive

Christie’s hits back over disputed Basquiat

Auction house seeks dismissal of lawsuit

Martha Lufkin
1 March 2008
Share

Boston

Christie’s has asked a New York court to dismiss a lawsuit against it seeking damages for its 1990 sale of a painting attributed to Jean-Michel Basquiat, Untitled, 1982, which the Authentication Committee of Basquiat’s estate allegedly rejected in 2006 as a fake.

The lawsuit was filed in September 2007 by Tony Shafrazi Gallery, which bought the painting from Christie’s in 1990, and Guido Orsi, to whom Mr Shafrazi sold it a year later (November 2007, p70).

In court filings, Christie’s says that Mr Shafrazi bought the work under a six-year warranty of authenticity only, and had exhibited the work at his gallery in a 1991 show with other works by Basquiat. “It is understandable that Shafrazi would be embarrassed to find that his judgment about the painting has been challenged by the Basquiat Committee—given that he holds himself out as an authority on Basquiat, has written essays about Basquiat, and has even published a book about Basquiat in which this very painting is illustrated. But it is outrageous for this sophisticated professional art dealer to try to shift the blame for this turn of events,” Christie’s said. Neither plaintiff has any legal claim against Christie’s at this late date, the auction house added.

Tony Shafrazi and Guido Orsi allege that authenticity issues had been raised before the Christie’s 1990 sale by Basquiat’s father Gerard Basquiat and John Cheim, director of the Robert Miller Gallery, which was exclusively representing Basquiat’s works at the time. They assert that Christie’s should have made a saleroom notice to the public that these authenticity issues had been raised.

Christie’s said that at the time of sale, Mr Shafrazi agreed that his “sole remedy” was limited to rescinding the contract and receiving back the purchase price. It rejects the plaintiffs’ claims for fraud, negligent inducement, negligent misrepresentation and other claims as too late or unfounded.

Jean-Michel BasquiatFakes & copiesChristie'sProvenanceLawsuits
Share
Subscribe to The Art Newspaper’s digital newsletter for your daily digest of essential news, views and analysis from the international art world delivered directly to your inbox.
Newsletter sign-up
Information
About
Contact
Cookie policy
Data protection
Privacy policy
Frequently Asked Questions
Subscription T&Cs
Terms and conditions
Advertise
Sister Papers
Sponsorship policy
Follow us
Instagram
Bluesky
LinkedIn
Facebook
TikTok
YouTube
© The Art Newspaper

Related content

Art marketnews
12 April 2024

Basquiat stretcher-bar painting could reach $30m during New York spring auctions

“The Italian Version of Popeye has no Pork in his Diet”, last publicly displayed in 2007, will be offered by Christie’s during its May sales

Benjamin Sutton
Authenticationarchive
31 May 2008

Authentication committee refused to give an opinion on my Basquiat, says collector

Complaint says work could lose $3m in value as a result

Melanie Gerlis
Auctionsnews
18 December 2015

Mystery of the Basquiat sold at Christie’s for $37m

But the work is still owned by Tony Shafrazi two months later

Dan Duray