Digital Editions
Newsletters
Subscribe
Digital Editions
Newsletters
Art market
Museums & heritage
Exhibitions
Books
Podcasts
Columns
Technology
Adventures with Van Gogh
Art market
Museums & heritage
Exhibitions
Books
Podcasts
Columns
Technology
Adventures with Van Gogh
Lawsuits
news

Judge rejects collector Ron Perelman's claims of $410m in losses from works that lost their ‘spark’ in fire

Perelman sued his insurers after a 2018 fire at his Hamptons home, claiming works by Warhol, Ruscha and Twombly had sustained damage

Carlie Porterfield
26 September 2025
Share
Firefighters evacuating artwork from Perelman's East Hampton estate, the Creeks, during a fire in 2018. New York State Supreme Court filing

Firefighters evacuating artwork from Perelman's East Hampton estate, the Creeks, during a fire in 2018. New York State Supreme Court filing

A New York judge ruled against billionaire art collector Ron Perelman on Friday (26 September) and his claims that a 2018 fire at his East Hampton home damaged part of his collection, an event that, in Perelman’s view, should have warranted an insurance payout of $410m. A lawsuit, filed through one of Perelman’s holding companies, claims five works lost their “oomph” in the fire as a result of exposure to smoke and water from a sprinkler system, causing a loss of value. The insurance underwriters from multiple companies, however, disputed his claim and maintained the works by Andy Warhol, Ed Ruscha and Cy Twombly did not sustain damage.

The trial, which began in July, shed light on the imperfect process of art valuation. Perelman claimed in the original complaint that the works “lost their luster, lost their depth, lost some of their definition and lost a lot of their character”, all important aspects of a work but difficult to quantify or assign monetary value to. While Perelman’s team believed the insurance policy justified a $410m payout for the five works, insurers claimed the works were only worth around $100m.

Andy Warhol's Elvis (21 Times) is one of five artworks that a lawsuit claimed were badly damaged during a fire at Ron Perelman's estate in the Hamptons, New York. New York State Supreme Court filing

New York State Supreme Court Justice Joel M. Cohen sided with the insurers on Friday, writing that “there was no visible damage to the five paintings”. However, Cohen did not agree with the defendant’s allegations that Perelman knowingly provided “false testimony” in July 2021, when he said he did not intend to sell the works.

Art market

Ron Perelman's $410m insurance trial is testing the limits of art valuation

Riah Pryor

Insurers’ lawyers allege the dealer Larry Gagosian and the billionaire collector Ken Griffin were invited to view the Twombly in 2020 before the claim was filed later that year. They further asserted Perelman only filed his lawsuit after he failed to sell the works, and noted the timing coincided with financial troubles at Revlon, which Perelman owned a majority stake in until the cosmetic company exited from bankruptcy in 2023. Unsealed court documents revealed Perelman sold more than 71 works between 10 March 2020 and 10 January 2022, fetching $963.3m collectively. Around $910.3m of that sum went toward paying creditors.

A lawyer for the holding companies acting on Perelman’s behalf did not say whether or not they will appeal the judge’s decision, according to The New York Times.

LawsuitsArt marketDamaged artInsurance
Share
Subscribe to The Art Newspaper’s digital newsletter for your daily digest of essential news, views and analysis from the international art world delivered directly to your inbox.
Newsletter sign-up
Information
About
Contact
Cookie policy
Data protection
Privacy policy
Frequently Asked Questions
Subscription T&Cs
Terms and conditions
Advertise
Sister Papers
Sponsorship policy
Follow us
Instagram
Bluesky
LinkedIn
Facebook
TikTok
YouTube
© The Art Newspaper

Related content

Art marketnews
18 July 2025

Ron Perelman's $410m insurance trial is testing the limits of art valuation

Long-running dispute centres over works owned by the billionaire collector that were damaged in a 2018 fire

Riah Pryor
Art marketnews
22 May 2024

Collector Ron Perelman sold $963m worth of art to pay off debt

Recently unsealed court filings show 71 works by artists like Basquiat, Twombly and Giacometti were unloaded over a two-year period

Carlie Porterfield
Gagosian Galleryarchive
1 January 2015

Trust no one: victory for Gagosian in two-year case

Court concludes that dealers’ statements of value are legally meaningless

Julia Halperin
Lawsuitsnews
20 October 2023

Collector Ron Perelman’s lawsuit against insurer over damaged art takes new turn

Court allows insurers to amend their argument, after arguing that the collector misrepresented his intention to sell “damaged” works, in $410m insurance claim

Riah Pryor