Digital Editions
Newsletters
Subscribe
Digital Editions
Newsletters
Art market
Museums & heritage
Exhibitions
Books
Podcasts
Columns
Technology
Adventures with Van Gogh
Art market
Museums & heritage
Exhibitions
Books
Podcasts
Columns
Technology
Adventures with Van Gogh
News
archive

Destruction of Croatian monuments ruled a war crime

Yugoslav air force guilty of destroying historic monuments in Dubrovnik

Jean-François Lasnier
30 April 2001
Share

It is 10 years since the bombing of the historic city of Dubrovnik by the Yugoslav air force. Now members of the air force have been found guilty of the destruction of historic monuments by the International Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (TPIY).

The TPIY has included the destruction of monuments as one of 16 indictment charges for the attack on Dubrovnik, carried out between 1 October and 31 December 1991. Although the names of the accused have not yet been released, the decision made public on 1 March marks an appreciable advance in international law, confirming the violation of the Hague Convention of 1954 on the protection of cultural property in wartime.

“This constitutes an historic precedent. It is the first time since the judgments made at the tribunals of Nuremberg and Tokyo that a crime against cultural property has been sanctioned by an international tribunal,” said Koichiro Matsuura, the director-general of Unesco.

Unesco played a tardy role in denouncing the destruction of the Croation heritage. It took many weeks of appeals before the organisation denounced the shelling and bombing of monuments. Dubrovnik has been on Unesco’s list of world heritage sites since 1979, and therefore benefitted from urgent funding for emergency restoration.

Under the new measures, any attack against cultural property, or its use or the use of its immediate surroundings as support for military action, their damage or destruction, renders the perpetrator liable to criminal proceedings. Theft and looting are included.

The recognition of these crimes is of course subject to an important variable—you cannot bring people to justice if they win the war.

• Originally appeared in The Art Newspaper with the headline "Destruction of monuments ruled a war crime"

NewsDisasters & destructionYugoslaviaWar & ConflictCroatia
Share
Subscribe to The Art Newspaper’s digital newsletter for your daily digest of essential news, views and analysis from the international art world delivered directly to your inbox.
Newsletter sign-up
Information
About
Contact
Cookie policy
Data protection
Privacy policy
Frequently Asked Questions
Subscription T&Cs
Terms and conditions
Advertise
Sister Papers
Sponsorship policy
Follow us
Instagram
Bluesky
LinkedIn
Facebook
TikTok
YouTube
© The Art Newspaper

Related content

War & Conflictarchive
1 March 1991

The law of war: The Hague Convention as military necessity or military convenience?

The 1954 convention is the product of nearly a century’s thought about cultural property in which it is implicit that it is the heritage of all mankind

John Henry Merryman
Comment
26 September 2016

Attacks on culture can be crimes against humanity

Trial in The Hague of Islamic extremist reminds us that the destruction of built heritage and human life are often linked

Robert Bevan