Digital Editions
Newsletters
Subscribe
Digital Editions
Newsletters
Art market
Museums & heritage
Exhibitions
Books
Podcasts
Columns
Technology
Adventures with Van Gogh
Art market
Museums & heritage
Exhibitions
Books
Podcasts
Columns
Technology
Adventures with Van Gogh
Art market
news

Behind the prices

Bendor Grosvenor
1 January 2016
Share

The Lock (around 1824-25) by John Constable, Sotheby’s, 9 December, £8m hammer (£9.1m with premium, estimate £8m-£12m)

Constable’s The Lock was a replica kept by the artist for his own collection. The first version was part of his celebrated series of ‘six-footer’ landscapes and was also sold recently, publicly making £22.4m (with fees) in July 2012 at Christie’s, London. While there is probably a premium for the first version, the Sotheby’s price might not immediately be seen as good news by the owner of the Christie’s version, who acquired the picture after agreeing to be a third-party guarantor. Whether they actually paid £22.4m (Christie’s guarantee system allows for certain fees to be paid to the guarantor) only they and Christie’s know.

Portrait of Thomas Western (1734) by William Hogarth, Christie’s, 9 December, £205,000 hammer (£248,500 with premium, estimate £30,000-£50,000)

While Christie’s evening sale may have disappointed, its day sale was more encouraging, making £2.9m (£3.6m with premium, estimate £3.1m-£4.8m). A highlight was a portrait by William Hogarth showing Thomas Western enjoying the life of a young gentleman at Cambridge in 1734. Cheaply estimated and in good condition, it went for four times its upper estimate. Sotheby’s day sale made a solid £3m hammer (£3.7m with premium, estimate £2.9m-£4.2m). Whether these figures can dispel the usual prophecies of doom for the “middle-market” remains to be seen.

Portrait of Henrietta Maria by Anthony van Dyck (1599-1641), Sotheby’s, 9 December, Unsold (estimate £1.5m-£2.5m)

A perhaps unexpected “buy-in” at Sotheby’s in December was a portrait by Van Dyck of Henrietta Maria (1609-69), the wife of King Charles I. The estimate seemed reasonable enough but the picture was encumbered by later additions. At some point, probably in the early 18th century, Van Dyck’s original half-length portrait was enlarged, the background overpainted, and a column and curtain added. Overwhelmed by the new setting, the queen also appears to be levitating, for the overpainter has misjudged her height. The tradition that the overpainting was the work of Joshua Reynolds does not, in my view, seem right. Better to get out the scissors, and set the queen free.

Art market
Share
Subscribe to The Art Newspaper’s digital newsletter for your daily digest of essential news, views and analysis from the international art world delivered directly to your inbox.
Newsletter sign-up
Information
About
Contact
Cookie policy
Data protection
Privacy policy
Frequently Asked Questions
Subscription T&Cs
Terms and conditions
Advertise
Sister Papers
Sponsorship policy
Follow us
Instagram
Bluesky
LinkedIn
Facebook
TikTok
YouTube
© The Art Newspaper

Related content

Art marketnews
1 January 2016

Slim pickings from Old Masters sales in a lukewarm London

Most of the consignments this season were really not up to scratch, with Christie’s, in particular, taking something of a beating

Bendor Grosvenor
Art marketnews
7 December 2018

Jump-bidding for Rembrandt's fingerprints and a tale of two Van Dycks: dispatches from London's Old Master auctions

Christie's and Sotheby's sell near identical Van Dyck portraits of Princess Mary, and new records are set for Frans Hals and a jolly Judith Leyster

Melanie Gerlis